| Navigation |
June 2007
Allergies
29.06.2007: EU Council of Ministers postpones its decision on approval of GM Amflora potato from BASF
The
Council of Ministers postponed the decision over whether GM potato
Amflora may be commercially cultivated in Europe in December.
On
14. July 2007 the trade commissioner Peter Mandelson delivered a strong
exhortation to the EU to take a lead in shaping global rules on GM
trade warned about the economic consequences. Na statesman can take the
risks of acting hastily and place financial and trade interests in
front of safety. The trade commissioner Mandelson would be well advised
to look after his trade and leave the biotechnology to the board of
scientific advisers whose job is to look after food and environmental
safety. [1]
Amflora is deeply modified in the starch it
produces. Non-GM potatos produce two components starch. 80% are
amylopectine with a long molecule with thickening properties. and 20%
amylose with short molecule with gelling character. Amflora produces
only amilopectin, wich is more useful for the industry as amylose.
[1]Biotechnology: EU Trade Commissioner needs GM food to increasing world trade. www.ourfood-news.com : 17.06.2007
29.06.2007 EFSA reaffirms its risk assessment of genetically modified maize MON 863 [1]
The
EFSA has examined a paper by Séralini et al. on the statistical
evaluation of a 90-day feeding study in animals with genetically
modified maize MON863, to identify any consequences for EFSA’s risk
assessment of the safety of MON 863. The paper presents an alternative
statistical analysis of the 90-day rat study that was considered in the
original risk assessment.
Following a detailed statistical
review and analysis by an EFSA Task Force, EFSA’s GMO Panel has
concluded that this re-analysis of the data does not raise any new
safety concerns.
The main conclusions are:
- The statistical analysis made by the authors of the paper did not take into account certain
important statistical considerations. The assumptions underlying the statistical methodology
employed by the authors led to misleading results.
- EFSA considers that the paper does not present a sound scientific justification in order to question
the safety of MON 863 maize.
-
Observed statistically significant differences reported by Monsanto,
Séralini et al., and EFSA, were considered not to be biologically
relevant. Therefore, the GMO Panel sees no
reason to revise its
previous Opinions that the MON 863 maize would not have an adverse
effect in the context of its proposed use.
Prior to this most recent work, MON 863 maize has been subject to a comprehensive risk assessment by EFSA and by other authorities which did not identify any adverse effects on human and animal health or the environment. The 90-day rat study analysed by this paper is one element of the comprehensive risk assessment of MON863 maize. In addition to the original Opinion in April 2004, this study has been reviewed again twice since then, prior to this recent work.
other related documents:
Letter to the Commission
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/about_efsa/structure/who_is_who/home
_cgl/correspondence.html
The GMO Panel statement
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/gmo/statements0/gmo_statement_mon863
_ratfeeding.html
EFSA statistical analysis of the Monsanto data
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/scientific_reports/statistical_analyses
_MON863.html
[1] EFSA reaffirms its risk assessment of genetically modified maize MON 863. Press release 28.06.2007.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press_room/press_release/pr_efsa_maize_Mon863.html
29.06.2007: Western root worm, a pest spread by global traffic and monoculturing [1]
Intensive
air traffic, monoculturing, mild winters force agriculture to look
after GM organisms to counter new coming pests in Europe.
The
Western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera) widely spread in American
has now moved to Europe. It is responsible for massive crop yield
losses in USA. The rootworm larvae chew the aerial roots of maize
stalks, penetrate roots and enter the inner stalk. Adult beetles emerge
in the summer between July and September feeding on aerial plant parts,
especially such as pollen and silk reducing fertility of the maize
plantation.
Agriculture combated the rootworm with costly
insecticides. In 2003, the US approved GM maize MON 863 and was
authorised for food and feed by the EU Commission and regarded as safe
by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in 2006, together with the
authorisation for import and industrial use of MON 810. Three more
western corn rootworm resistant maize lines joined MON 863 and are
currently Awaiting approval: are line MIR 604, line 59122, and line MON
88017. The line, 59122, is awaiting approval for cultivation in Europe.
GM maize is seen as a possible counterfeit to the plant disease.
The
pest native to Central America moved to the maize monoculture regions
of North America finding there a perfect habitat. Massive Air traffic
bulk loaded maize freight has transported the beetle over the Atlantic.
The insects are probably attracted by the light of aircraft cargo
compartments. They are therefore seen in the proximities of destination
airports starting with the Belgrade airport.
EU measures 2003
In October 2003, the European Commission has set measures to slow down the spread of the western corn rootworm:
Traps
with pheromones to attract female beetles are distributed. In case the
western corn rootworm is found, a one kilometre radius surrounding the
site of incidence is declared a zone of infestation, and a five
kilometre radius is declared a security zone.
The affected sites may not be planted with maize the following year. In addition, the sites must be treated with soil insecticides, soil and plant parts are not allowed to leave the controlled zone. Only after a certain period of time is harvesting permitted.
Crop
rotation is not enough as the long term pest management. In USA the
beetles have adapted to the crop rotation between corn and soy. The
larvae can also survive on wild plants and weeds of test fields.
Stefan
Vidal says that chemical control methods and transgenic maize are the
only management strategies that can be effective in regions of
intensive maize cultivation. This is urgent, because of continual
invasion and its potential establishment in Italy of the new pest will
threaten maize production areas in other EU member countries in the
immediate future. [2]
Tactics to avoid resistance [3]
The
American Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed what is known
as resistance management comprising the refuges zones.
A strips of
four meters of non-GM maize must be planted around the GM maize field.
The so called refuges from exposure to toxin enable survival of
susceptible individuals, which decreases the intensity of selection.
Ideally, relatively large numbers of susceptible individuals from
refuges survive and mate with few resistant survivors from transgenic
plants.
Unexpectedly,
the estimated resistance allele frequency did not increase and Bt
cotton remained extremely effective against pink bollworm. The same
effect was noted later with bt Maize. [4]
The delay in resistance
can be explained by refuges of cotton without Bt toxin, recessive
inheritance of resistance, incomplete resistance, and fitness costs
associated with resistance. [5]
[1] Naar aanleiding van de adviesvraag betreffende het dossier EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/12,
maislijn 59122 voor de import en verwerking van genetisch gemodificeerde mais
door Pioneer Hi-Bred International, adviseert de COGEM
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=4&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cogem.net%2Fpdfdb
%2Fadvies%2FCGM051122-01.pdf&ei=MOyERrzfNorG0QS_ksHKAg&usg=
AFQjCNE8OPGdl6eRbk3SqOo93DIjvxrwLA&sig2=86d7FT18eRtlRZvfInBoWA
[2]
Biomatnet: Threat to European maize production by invasive quarantine
pest, Western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera): a new
sustainable crop management approach. QLK5-1999-01110
http://www.biomatnet.org/secure/FP5/S1217.htm
[3]
Tabashnik, Bruce E.: Seeking the root of insect resistance to
transgenic plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 94, pp. 3488–3490,
April 1997
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/94/8/3488?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=
&fulltext=Tabashnik&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&volume=94&issue=8&resourcetype=HWCIT
[4]
Tabashnik, Bruce E.; Patin, Amanda L.; Dennehy, Timothy J.; Liu,
Yong-Biao; Carriere, Yves; Sims, Maria A.; Antilla, Larry.: Frequency
of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in field populations of pink
bollworm PNAS 2000 97: 12980-12984
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/97/24/12980.
[5]
Tabashnik, B. E.; Dennehy,T. J.; Carriere, Y.: Delayed resistance to
transgenic cotton in pink bollworm. PNAS, October 25, 2005; 102(43):
15389 - 15393.
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/102/43/15389
29.06.2007: Nutrition
terminology databank available now [1]
Access: http://iate.europa.eu
A single database for all EU-related terminology (InterActiveTerminology for Europe) in 23 languages opens to the public. It is useful to solve many queries related to nutrition and Eu-related terminology.
28.06.2007: Wild birds infected by avian flue virus found in Germany [1]
Six
wild birds in Bavaria and three swans in Saxony found dead due to
infection with the H5N1 virus on end of July 2007. The Federal Minister
of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection Horst Seehofer calls for
vigilantness on this matter.
Safety rules concerning dead or
diseased wild birds according to the Federal association of practicing
veterinary surgeons ( Bundesverband Deutscher Tierärzte) [2]
- Merciness with sick wild birds should not invite to incautiosness. Never touch wild animals with bare hands.
-
Dead animals or wild birds with signs of disease must be reported
immediately at the next veterinary office or official health department.
- No free run for dogs and cats should be allowed for dogs and cats in epidemic areas
[1] Minister of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection: Neue Fälle von Vogelgrippe nachgewiesen
http://www.bmelv.de/cln_045/nn_754188/DE/07-SchutzderTiere/Tierseuchen/Vogelgrippe
/Chronologie.html__nnn=true
[2] AHO Aktuell 27.06.2007: Vogelgrippe: Hinweise zum Umgang mit kranken oder verendeten Tieren
http://ticker-kleintiere.animal-health-online.de/20070627-00000/
27.06.2007 Low-Carbohydrate diets, like the Atkins diet may reduce beneficial gut bacteria [1]
Sylvia
Duncan and colleagues 2007 found in a study that prolonged use of very
low-carbohydrate weight-loss diets may decreased concentrations of
butyrate and butyrate-producing bacteria (mainly bifidobacteria) in
faeces.
According to the authors butyrate production is determined
by the content of fermentable carbohydrate in the diet. Other studies
had found that butyrate stops cancer cells from growing, and so helps
prevent colorectal cancer.
The authors stress that plenty of
sources of fibre found in fruit and vegetables are important to provide
the right sort of carbohydrates for the beneficial bacteria if low
carbohydrate diets are to be consumed for long periods of time.
Other critics concerning this type of diet is the higher risk of clogged arteries and heart attack in the long-term.
[1]
Duncan, Sylvia H.; Belenguer, Alvaro; Holtrop, Grietje; Johnstone,
Alexandra M.; Flint, Harry J.; Loble Gerald E.: Reduced Dietary Intake
of Carbohydrates by Obese Subjects Results in Decreased Concentrations
of Butyrate and Butyrate-Producing Bacteria in Feces. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology Volume 73, Number 4, Pages 1073-1078
doi:10.1128/AEM.02340-06
http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/73/4/1073
27.06.2007: The Aspartame controversy
The 2005 Ramazzini publication: Aspartame linked to increased risk of leukaemia, lymphomas and breast cancer:
In 2005 Morango Soffritti and colleagues at the Ramazzini Foundation
found aspartame to increase lymphomas and leukaemias in females. They
write in their publication of 2005:”The results of this mega-experiment
indicate that Aspartame is a multipotential carcinogenic agent, even at
a daily dose of 20 mg/kg body weight, much less than the current
acceptable daily intake. On the basis of these results, a reevaluation
of the present guidelines on the use and consumption of APM is urgent
and cannot be delayed.” [1]
The 2007 Ramazzini publication: Foetal life and children at increased cancer risc due to Aspartame [2]
In
their second long-term carcinogenicity bioassay on APM the authors
conclude that when lifespan exposure to Aspartame begins during foetal
life, its carcinogenic effects are increased.
On the basis of the present findings, the authors believe that a review of the current regulations
governing the use of aspartame cannot be delayed. This review is particularly urgent with regard to
aspartame-containing
beverages, heavily consumed by children. The authors stress that other
studies were made on aged people and did not consider pregnancy and
infants. [2]
What consumer can do: Avoid Diet Pepsi, Diet Cola, yoghurt light soft drinks light, diet yoghurt [3]
This
has led some consumer groups, particularly in the US, to call for a
review of the safety data on aspartame and for consumers to avoid
products that contain the ingredient. Aspartame is used in carbonated
and powdered soft drinks, hot chocolate, chewing gum, candy, desserts,
yogurt, tabletop sweeteners, and vitamins. As a result of the new
study, for the first time CSPI downgraded aspartame on its online
Chemical Cuisine directory from a “use caution” rating to “everyone
should avoid.” CSPI also urges everyone to avoid the artificial
sweeteners acesulfame potassium and saccharin. It rates sucralose, also
known by the brand name Splenda, as safe. [3]
On The Early Show
24.April 2007, medical contributor Dr. Mallika Marshall said: “ ... I
think we should probably be a little less cavalier about giving our
children tons of foods with artificial sweeteners and probably should
go back to the basics of milk and water and fruits and vegetables
instead of diet soda and reduced calorie foods." OurFood strongly
supports this statement. [4]
Official food regulators: USA FDA and European EFSA find no reason to reconsider the approval of Aspartame [5]
FDA: The
Acceptable Daily Intake of aspartame in the United States is 50 mg per
kg of body weight. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says that it
finds no reason to alter its previous conclusion that aspartame is safe
as a general purpose sweetener in food. The FDA alleges that the
conclusions of the two Ramazzini studies are not consistent with other
studies evaluated by FDA.
According to FDA Aspartame was first
approved in the United States in 1981 and is one of the most widely
used artificial sweeteners. When metabolised by the body, aspartame is
broken down into two common amino acids, aspartic acid and
phenylalanine, and a third substance, methanol. These three substances
are available in similar or greater amounts from eating common foods.
European Union EFSA: the
first Ramazzini study in May 2006 the EFSA responded to the 2005
Ramazzini report stating that there was no need for a further safety
review of aspartame nor a revision of the acceptable daily intake of 40
mg/kg body weight. [6]
CSPI calls for urgent review of the study:
In the US, consumer group the Center for Science in the Public Interest
(CSPI) called on the FDA to urgently review the study, regarding the
fact that aspartame-containing beverages are heavily consumed by
children. [3]
No risk of cancer linked to saccharin, aspartame and other sweeteners: The Milan case-control study 2007 [ 7]
The
epidemiological study in Milan, Italy concluded that there was no
indication of an association between sweetener consumption and cancer
risk . A Gallu and colleagues 2006 found no association between
saccharin, aspartame and other sweeteners and the risk of several
common neoplasms.
The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study on aspartame [8] [9]
Unhee
Lim and colleagues 2006 of the National Cancer Institute in a study on
people found no increased cancer risk in a group aged 50 to 71,
consuming 2 cans of soda per day ( 400 mg aspartame/day).[8]
Aspartame consumption: [9]
In the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, aspartame consumption ranged
from 0 to 3400 mg per day about 19 cans of soda at the high end. There
are 180 mg of aspartame in a 12 ounce can of diet soda.
FDA's
Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of aspartame is 50 mg per kilogram of
body weight or about 3,750 mg (21 cans of diet soda) for an adult
weighing 75 kilograms (165 lb).
The average aspartame
consumption among diet beverage consumers in the NIH-AARP Diet and
Health Study was 200 mg per day, or about 7 percent of the ADI.
An
animal study that fed aspartame to rats saw lymphoma/leukemia increase
in female rats, starting from 20 mg per kilogram of body weight (a
person weighing 75 kilograms or 165 lbs, consuming 1500 mg aspartame,
or about 8 cans of diet soda.
[1] Soffritti, Morando;Belpoggi,
Fiorella; Esposti,Davide Degli; Lambertini, Luca; Tibaldi, Eva; Rigano,
Anna: First Experimental Demonstration of the Multipotential
Carcinogenic Effects of Aspartame Administered in the Feed to
Sprague-Dawley Rats. Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 114,
Number 3, March 2006
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2005/8711/abstract.html
[2]
Soffritti, Morando; Belpoggi, Fiorella; Tibaldi, Eva; Esposti, Davide
Degli; Lauriola, Michela: Lifespan Exposure to Low Doses of Aspartame
Beginning During Prenatal Life Increases Cancer Effects in Rats.
Environmental Health Perspectives. On-line 13 June 2007, doi:
10.1289/ehp.10271
http://www.ehponline.org/members/2007/10271/10271.pdf
[3]CSPI:
FDA Should Reconsider Aspartame Cancer Risk, Say Experts. New Rat Study
Links Artificial Sweetener with Lymphomas, Breast Cancer
http://www.cspinet.org/new/200706251.html
[4] CBS News New York, April 24, 2007Aspartame's Safety Questioned Again. Another Study Suggests It Heightens Cancer Risk
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/24/earlyshow/health/main2721195.shtml?source
=RSSattr=Health_2721195
[5] FDA: FDA Statement on European Aspartame Study. CFSAN/Office of Food Additive Safety
April 20, 2007.
http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fpaspar2.html
[6]
The EFSA Journal (2006) 356, 1-44.: Opinion of the Scientific Panel on
Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in contact
with Food (AFC) on a request from the Commission related to a new
long-term carcinogenicity study on aspartame Question number
EFSA-Q-2005-122 Adopted on 3 May 2006
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/afc/afc_opinions/1471.html
[7]Gallu,
S.; Scotti L.; Negri, E.R Talamini R.; Franceschi S.; Montella M.;
Giacosa, A.; Dal Maso, L.; La Vecchia, C.: Artificial sweeteners and
cancer risk in a network of case–control studies(The Annals of
Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl346)
http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/1/40
[8]
Lim, Unhee, Subar A.F., Mouw T., Hartge P., Morton L.M.,
Stolzenberg-Solomon R., Campbell D., Hollenbeck A.R., Schatzkin A.:
Consumption of aspartame-containing beverages and incidence of
hematopoietic and brain malignancies. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers
Prev. 2006. Vol. 15.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/04/05/health/webmd/main1473654.shtml
[9] National Cancer Institute: Aspartame and Cancer: Questions and Answers.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/AspartameQandA
23.06.2007: GM maize Herculex RW import approval on the EU agenda
Representatives
from the 27 EU member states will vote on the 25 of June 2007 to
authorise imports GM Maize 59122 known as Herculex RW with the bt
protein resisting the maize rootworm. Approval will be for use in food,
feed and processing.
Herculex RW has been planted for the first
time in US in 2006 and was approved . Australia, New Zealand, Canada,
China, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Philippines and Taiwan.EFSA approved it in
March 2007. Only Austria and Luxenburg may block the vote. Overrunning
Austria and Luxenburg will not be to difficult for Herculex RW which
will contaminate the whole European feed (meat, eggs, aquaculture), the
glucose-fructose syrup (broadly used in all fruit yoghurt and dairy
products, bakery products).
The European Green Party is against
the authorisation claiming that there are serious and legitimate health
concerns about Herculex RW maize as changes in the blood parameters and
in liver weight in rats fed with this GM variety were found in a
research.
This is being sustained by the Italian Green Party
and the Italian farmers' union which also protested against the plans
to test GM versions of GM olives and tomatoes. Organic associations
strongly protest against an increasing contamination of their products
by GM intrusion.
23.06.2007: The European Green Airplane [1]
At
the Paris Air Show in June 2007, European Science and Research
Commissioner Janez Potočnik presented plans for a major public/private
partnership for a greener air transport system "Clean Sky" Its
objectives are to reduce CO2 emissions by around 40%, NOx emissions by
60% and noise by 50%. applying to three main aircraft categories (long
range, regional, rotorcraft). The EU will contribute €800 million.
Clean
Sky Initiative aims to develop advanced technologies for the next
generation of aircraft in order to establish an innovative and
competitive Air Transport System.
It is well understood that US will not join this initiative. It is well understood that the European Union hat signed the open air pact with USA hoping to double air traffic which is good for business. However, it is also well understood that air traffic must be reduced to a very minimum. Tourism, food and unnecessary air transportation should be phased out. Infrastructure and local production in underpriviledged EU regions where these €800 million could help hightech production as well improve agrartechnology.
Please do not use “green” and “clean” related to aviation. It demonstrates the decay of the meaning of the green movement.
[1] EU Press Room: Research project for greener aviation takes off at Paris Air Show
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/07/854&format=HTML&aged
=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
23.06.2007 US cisgene French fryes trying to solve the acryamide issue [1]
Caius Rommens, working for the US potato leader J. R. Simplot [2] has created a new Russet Ranger potato variety.
He
calls it a cisgene potato to distinguish from the transgene varieties
of GM food. Cigenesis differs from the trangenic technique in that no
alien gene is introduced in the plant. Some of its own genes are
inverted so they silence their expression. Rommens inverted three genes
of the Russet Ranger.
There
are more than 50,000 genes in a potato. The scientists removed three of
those genes and introduced reversed replicas that silence their
activity.
One gene producing asparagin and two other genes which transform potato starch in sugar when stored frozen.
These peaces of the potato genome were inversely rewritten and reintroduced in the genome. These new genes have now a terminator activity, they block the code of the cell which is now unable to produce asparagine and sugar and less acrylamid can be formed when fried.
The
reconfigured gene structure will be invisible to the consumer because
the government does not require labels as do most countries in Europe.
Company
officials stress that unfortunately the new potato is in a preliminary
research stage. It will be five to 10 years before Simplot markets. [1]
Cisgenesis should not be treated as GMO [3]
According
to Schouten, Krens and Jacobsen 2006 the European legislative framework
on GMOs regards mutagenesis and the fusion of cells from sexually
compatible plants as methods of genetic modification, the resulting GM
plants are excluded from that framework by the GMO Directive (European
Parliament, 2001).
The authors claim that the products of
cisgenesis are more similar to plants derived by mutagenesis or
traditional breeding methods, cisgenesis should also be excluded from
GMO frameworks and regulated in the same way as traditional breeding.
The position of other organisations [1]
CSPI:
Jaffe, of the Center for Science in the Public Interest calls for
regulations and the need to make sure there are no food safety risks,
and if there are health benefits, the Ceter could support that.
FDA:
According to Alan Bennet from FDA in Portland, Oregon, Goovernment
regulators would likely be a smaller obstacle. With all genetically
modified foods, the agency examines the final product to ensure it does
not differ in taste or health effects from what the customer expects.
Our concern is not how it's produced, but what the end product is.
However,
the side effects of the inversion of genes are unpredictable. Instead
of waiting 5 to 10 years for the new potato to be put on market it
would be wiser to change nutritional habits right now , for instance
the consumer could be advised to accept healthy light yellow French
fries (fried at 130°C instead of 180-230°C) which are not so crisp as
the brown ones laden with acryalamid.
[1] Agbioworl: Jessy Harlan Alderman: Scientists Search for the Perfect Potato. The Oregonian , Jan 7,2007.
http://www.agbioworld.org/newsletter_wm/index.php?caseid=archive&newsid=2638
[2] Simplot: Bringing Earth´s Resources to Life
http://www.simplot.com/
[3]
Schouten, Henk J.; Krens, Frans A.; Jacobsen, Evert: Cisgenic plants
are similar to traditionally bred plants International regulations for
genetically modified organisms should be altered to exempt cisgenesis
European Molecular Biology Organization , Vol 7, (8) 2006
doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400769
http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/sj.embor.7400769
22.06.2007: Rapid post mortem tests to detect TSE (Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy) in small ruminants not safe. [1]
The
situation of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy (TSE) of small
ruminants like goats and sheep in Europe is analysed by the EU Food
Safety in its release “ new information about TSE in goats”. [2]
Evaluation
of the validated TSE tests found that they do not perform equally
toward atypical cases and that difference in performance result in
under- or non recognition of various types of scrapie. Moreover, a new
type of TSE (atypical scrapie cases/NOR98) not previously recognized in
the EU, was detected in small ruminants.
Currently
atypical/Nor98 has been detected in a large number of European
countries and approximately constitutes 80% of test positive cases
identified in EU.
New tests have to successfully pass all
stages of a new evaluation process. New tests should detect classical
scrapie, atypical scrapie and BSE in sheep and detection of preclinical
cases and comply with criteria on limitations posed by analytical
sensitivity in comparison with bioassay.
The criteria set higher standards than have previously been approved for validation of small ruminant post mortem TSE tests for classical scrapie and BSE as well as for atypical scrapie. Considering data available about abnormal PrP distribution in the three recognized small ruminants TSE forms (BSE, classical scrapie and atypical scrapie) the use of brainstem appears to be the best compromise for detection of all TSE agents in small ruminants. In consequence, officially confirmed (by CRL and NRL) positive/negative brainstem will be used for the evaluation of tests.
The
BIOHAZ panel recommends that tests already approved for the detection
of TSE in small ruminants should be required to participate in the new
evaluation in order to confirm their robustness and their ability to
fulfil the additional performance requirements (e.g. atypical cases and
analytical sensitivity).
[1] EFSA: Opinion of the Scientific
Panel BIOHAZ: Protocol for the evaluation of rapid post mortem tests to
detect TSE in small ruminants.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/etc/medialib/efsa/science/biohaz
[2] EFSA Food Safety from Farm to Fork: BSE/Scrapie- TSE in goats http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biosafety/bse/goats_index_en.htm
22.07.2007: Omega-3 Eggs claims deceive consumer [1]
The
Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) urged the FDA to stop
seven egg producers from implying that their eggs can reduce the risk
of heart disease. In fact, says CSPI, egg producers should not be
making heart-healthy claims, because the FDA specifically prohibits
such claims on eggs and other foods high in cholesterol or saturated
fat.
Egg
producers take advantage of consumers’ limited knowledge of the
different types of omega-3s. While the FDA permits claims for a
possible reduced risk of heart disease linked to two kinds of omega-3s,
DHA and EPA, the agency does not allow such claims for other omega-3s.
CSPI commissioned a lab test that found that less than half of the
advertised 350 mg of omega-3s in a Land O Lakes egg came from EPA and
DHA.
“The
most beneficial omega-3 fatty acids come from fish, fish oil, and
algae,” said CSPI senior staff attorney Ilene Heller. “Even if eggs had
the ‘right’ kind of omega-3s, they still contain significant levels of
saturated fat and cholesterol, which increase the risk of heart
disease.”
Products named in the CSPI complaint include:
• Land O Lakes
claims that “omega-3 All-Natural Eggs” are a “good source of
heart-healthy nutrition” despite the fact that FDA has not defined the
term “good source” for omega-3s and that the eggs contain too much
saturated fat and cholesterol to meet FDA’s definition of healthy.
• Eggland’s Best uses
unapproved nutrient content claims for omega-3s on its carton and on
its Web site. In addition, the company claims that its eggs have 25
percent less saturated fat than regular eggs. But that difference is
less than half a gram—an amount that the FDA considers trivial for
purposes of nutrition labeling.
• Safeway Specialty 3 Eggs
misleadingly boasts “100 mg of omega-3s” even though the FDA has not
set standards for such omega-3 claims. In addition, the principal
source of omega-3s in the hens’ diets is likely not a source that may
be associated with heart benefits.
• Gold Circle Farms
claims that its eggs contain “450 mg of omega-3s.” The claims are based
on two eggs even though the official FDA serving size for eggs is one
egg.
• The Country Hen
illegally claims “the difference is an egg that is simply healthy” even
though the product does not meet regulatory requirements for “healthy,”
and also makes its claims based on two eggs.
• Full Spectrum Farms boasts
that its product has “30 mg” of unspecified omega-3s even though one
ordinary egg, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, contains
37 mg of omega-3s, 20 mg of which are DHA and EPA.
• Giving Nature asserts
that the company feeds its hens flax seed which “has been known to hold
high levels of DHA omega-3.” But, according to the Flax Council of
Canada and others, the omega-3s that FDA considers healthful (DHA and
EPA) are not found in plants such as flax seed.
[1] Center for Science in the Public Interest: Egg Producers Deceive Consumers, Violate Law with Bogus Omega-3 Claims
http://cspinet.org/new/200706211.html
22.06.2007: EU rises the threshold of "GM Free" labelling causing indignation in UK [1]
Natural
normal grown food is acute endangered to be contaminated by the genetic
engineering escapades of a handful global enterprises. Governments bow
their head to their lobby and rise the threshold labelling of
contamination instead of combating the underlying cause which would be
to phase out GM food.
EU agriculture ministers last week
agreed that food accidentally contaminated with up to 0.9% genetically
modified content could be labelled "GM free". But the Soil Association
and Organic Farmers and Growers, which together certify more than 90%
of the UK's organic food, today pledged to keep their own criteria at
the current 0.1 per cent.
On 21 June 2007, a delegation
representing 70 organic businesses, urged the Secretary of State for
the Environment not to make organic consumers pay for GM contamination.
The Government currently proposes to allow up to 0.9% GM in organic
food without the GM companies being liable for this damage. This is
despite the fact that in European law, 0.9% is not a general GM
threshold, but rather a threshold below which accidental contamination
does not have to be labelled.
The UK ognanic associations
confirmed that they would maintain their current non-GM standards for
organic food, at the effective minimum detectable level of 0.1% GM,
whatever the Government decides.
During their consultation,
the Government met with a number of GM companies, including
AstraZeneca, BASF Plant Science, Bayer CropScience, Dow AgroSciences,
Du Pont (UK) Ltd, Monsanto UK Ltd, and Syngenta Ltd. Not one organic
business was consulted directly, and this is the first meeting the
Government has had with representatives of organic businesses.
[1]
Organic consumers should not pay for GM contamination – representatives
of 70 organic companies tell Miliband Press Release 06/21/2007
http://www.soilassociation.org/
20.06.2007: Copper may reverse cardiac hypertrophy caused by high blood pressure [1] [2]
A study on mice with unhealthy enlarged hearts found that the condition reversed itself with supplementation of copper.
The
researchers hope this could also humans be applied in humans using 3 mg
dosis/ day.The current recommended daily intake for humans, however, is
only 0.9 mg/day. Although high, the dose was nevertheless below safe
upper limits for copperthat were fed the equivalent of three times the
amount of copper recommended for human health.
According
to the list of copper-rich foods of the US Agricultural Research
Service (ARS) some foods rich in copper which could help people with
cardiac hypertrphy are: [3] Food Mg Cu/100g Mollusks, oyster 2,50 Baking chocolate, bitter 2,00 Mushrooms 0,40 Crustaceans, crab, blue, canned 1,18 Tomato paste 0,40 Barley, pearled, raw 0,10 Cashew 3,70 Beans, white, canned 0,80
[1]
Jiang, Youchun; Reynolds, Corey; Xiao, Chang; Feng, Wenke; Zhou,
Zhanxiang; Rodriguez, Walter; Tyagi, Suresh C.; Eaton, John W.; Saari,
Jack T. ; Kang Y. James: Dietary copper supplementation reverses
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy induced by chronic pressure overload in
mice J. Exp. Med. 2007 204: 657-666. doi:10.1084/jem.20061943.
http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/abstract/jem;204/3/657
[2] Bashyam, Hema: Heavy metal for a troubled heart. J. Exp. Med. 2007 204: 455.
http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem;204/3/455a
[3] USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 17 Nutrient Lists
http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/SR17/wtrank/wt_rank.html
20.06.2007: New researche on snacks[1]
Marie-Pierre
St-Onge and colleagues 2007 in a study found that replacing low-fat and
high-fat snacks with snacks rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs)
and low in saturated and trans fatty acids improves cardiovascular
health.
The authors found in their study that the reduction of LDL-
and total cholesterol concentrations were greater with the low-fat and
the high-PUFA diets than with the high-fat diet The high-PUFA diet
tended to reduce triacylglycerol concentrations, and this change was
greater than that with the low-fat and high-fat diets. In addition the
PUFA diet was the only one that tended to reduce triacylglyerol
concentrations. However this that low fat diets may lead to reduction
in high density lipoprotein (HDL /good cholesterol), and increase
triacylglycerol concentrations. Some high fat foods such as nuts and
avocados are therefore considered as healthy.
The authors
concluded that snack type affects cardiovascular health. Consuming
snack chips rich in PUFA and low in saturated or trans fatty acids
instead of high-saturated fatty acid and trans fatty acid or low-fat
snacks leads to improvements in lipid profiles concordant with
reductions in cardiovascular disease risk.
According to the
authors the consumption of snacks above balanced meals should not be
promoted as healthy, but this research adds to the evidences that
snacks, fast food and restaurant meals should be reformulated to reduce
unhealthy trans fatty acids and to increase polyunsaturated fatty
acids. Organisations like the Center for Science in the Public Interest
(CSPI) are working hard on this issue
[1]
St-Onge,Marie-Pierre; Aban, Inmaculada; Bosarge, Aubrey; Gower,
Barbara; Hecker , Kari D.; Allison, David B.: Snack chips fried in corn
oil alleviate cardiovascular disease risk factors when substituted for
low-fat or high-fat snacks. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
Vol. 85, No. 6, 1503-1510, June 2007
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/85/6/1503
19.06.2007: Not enough nutritional evidence to recommend organic foods over other foods.[1]
According
to Claire Williamson 2007 writing in an article in the Journal of the
Science of Food and Agriculture there are limited data claiming that
organic foods are more nutritious than conventionally produced foods.
In
this review no overall differences in nutritional profiles for food
grown conventionally or organically were reported. Only few exceptions
were found, such as organic potatoes and leafy organic vegetables which
were richer sources of vitamin C than their conventionally grown
vegetables.
No differences were found in nutrients of main
concern in dairy products such as calcium, zinc, vitamin B2 or vitamin
B12. Only in milk less sought-after nutrients like linoleic acids ,
vitamin E, beta- carotene and poyunsaturated fatty acids were found
higher in organic milk. However these items are sourced from other
foods.
The world market of certified organic foods is
growing rapidly. Behind the marketing efforts of retailers
international exporters a huge interest of the international business
groups is flourishing. Transportation over long distances and even air
freight is being considered by the certification boards. [2] [3]
Avoiding
pollution of the environment with pesticides and chemical fertilisers,
using crop rotation and good animal husbandry to control pests and
diseases are the basics of a sustainable method of agriculture. The
primary goal is the protection of the environment. A side-product is
the food which is harvested in such environment.
Buying
organics grown far away you are doing the best for your supermarket
corporation but its not better for your health or the environment than
choosing cheaper conventional produces.
If you want to go
organics look for small organic farmers, small organic stores which
have their ware supplied by surrounding farms, and look for weekly
markets of your town.
Ingredients: Organic products of the
shelves of your supermarket often do not differ from conventional ones
such as organic fruit yoghurt. It has the same addition of 10 per cent
of sugar-glucose syrup increasing the risc of obesity and diabetes.
Organics
is a philosophy of cohabitation of mankind and nature. On the other
hand supermarket shelf ware organics is a genial marketing effort to
boost business, the contact with the roots of organics are blurred.
Soil Association Standards dept: Airfreight consultation [3]
From: Karl Heinz Wilm
Muelenweg 5
26419 Schortens
Germany
author@ourfood.com
To: Soil Association Standards dept.
South Plaza,
Bristol
BS1 3NX
Subject: Airfreight consultation Shortens, 05.06.2007
Dear Sirs!
I
appeal to you to stay firm in banning airfreight from organics.
Allowing airfreight destroys the foundation of the organic movement,
adapting it to the supermarket logistics. This will undermine the
confidence of the consumer on the producers and make certification
watery.
Organic eyewash
Here are some of your arguments and my comment:
-Isolated
initiatives like Tesco and Mark & Spencer: These initiatives are
bound to specific produces and are not part of an all round organic
label. Only clear commitment to guidelines bringing all products and
all producers in one boat.
- Air freight has the highest
global warming potential of any form of transport: It is opposed to the
deepest principles of organic philosophy. Opening the door for niche
products, the whole organic segment will be questionable.
-
Air freight enables producers in some of the poorest regions of the
world to supply high value fresh fruit and vegetables to Europe.: This
is not true, as the poorest have no access to the high technical
logistic of air traffic. Only the Australian lobby, specialised on air
traffic to USA is interested to sell their surplus to Europe, after a
sudden wave of US own produces.
- Empty shelves: Worse than empty shelves is the loss of confidence of the consumer. Airfreighting organics is a scandal.
Your Questions
1-
If no ban of air freight is possible the declaration “ Transported by
Air” in close proximity to the word ORGANIC should be compulsory.
2- But, a ban is indispensable.
3- The next certification renewal should withdraw the approval of the product.
You are doing a good job, and stay firm to the principles of the organic movement
Best regards
Karl Heinz Wilm
www.ourfod-news.com
[1]
Williamson, Claire S.: Is organic food better for our health?;
Nutrition Bulletin, June 2007, Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 104-108
[2]
Ourfood-News: 31.05.2007 UK food sector is the world leader in food
health and environment movement, an example to be looked upon by the
leaders of the G 8 meeting.
http://www.ourfood-news.com/Archives_May_2007.html
[3] http://www.soilassociation.org/airfreight
18.06.2007: Gellan film enhancing stability of vitamin C [1]
Paula
Leona and Ana Rojas found that an edible film based on 1% gellan and
glycerol in water enhanced the stability and non-enzymic browning
resistance of vitamin C having an application as antioxidant in various
formulations. Natural antioxidants like ascorbic acid are increasingly
used in place of synthetic ones.
[1] Leona, Paula G. and Rojas,
Ana M.: Gellan gum films as carriers of l-(+)-ascorbic acid. Food
Research International (Elsevier). June 2007, Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages
565-575. Doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2006.10.021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2006.10.021
17.06.2007: Biotechnology: EU Trade Commissioner needs GM food to increasing world trade [1]
The
speech of Peter Mandelson on biotechnology on 14 June 2007 was hailed
by the audience of industry delegates and widely distributed.
I
think that the job of the EU Trade Commissioner is to promote trade. He
must backup nuclear weapon exports, import toxics and dope as long cash
flows. This is business, this is why his office exists. However, It is
the job of science to avoid proliferation of premature developments on
modified organism or other activities of global negative spin-offs.
Europe
is one of the greatest exporter of manufactured foods because of the
confidence on quality and safety of its products and its policy on
safety from fork-to-table. This image is good selling argument for an
involvement in international tasks.
- Mandelson strongly defended an open European approach to biotechnology and GM food which plays a crucial role in agriculture and agricultural trade both in Europe and the developing world. Europe's interests are not served by being outside a global market that is steadily working its way through the issues raised by GM food. However we should not sacrifice principles of life for the interests of a global market controlled by less than a handful corporates.
- He argued that Europe has the appropriate risk-management systems for ensuring that biotechnology is rigorously tested but that these systems can be badly undermined if politicians and risk-managers do not defend the science that underpins them. However, it is the duty of risk-manager to look after food safety on a science which is to young to be released to change genetic pool of the whole world in just a few years.
- He said that any blanket rejection of GMOs ignores the fact that genetically modified foods have played a key part in past revolutions in agricultural productivity and will be central to providing sufficient food and feed stocks for a growing population in the developing world.
However, any interference in the economy of developing countries introducing global technologies has brought destructive displacement of small peasants which are the huge part of the population of developing countries. Examples of this are soy plantation in Argentina, Brazil or the outcomes of the Green Revolution in India.
- Mandelson said that Europe may find it increasingly hard to source animal feed that is approved under EU rules – putting a heavy strain on the EU livestock sector.
However, this opens our eyes how far GM contamination is going. Against the absolute monopoly of GM leaded by soy and corn, the big ones of feed contaminating the whole food chain is why Europe must be strong to ensure a future safe world.
- Mandelson argues that the EU should take the lead in shaping a global system of clear rules that allow exporters and importers to trade GM crops and feed (and so many good things bringing more traffic, more exchange and more cash flow) in confidence. He identifies negotiations on the Codex Alimentarius, bringing the Biosafety Clearing House of the Cartagena Protocol to full operational status and the reinforcement of the WTO SPS Agreement as key priorities.
The Codex is doing a great job, so does WTO and SPS Agreement to promote global trade. However, science must rule safety concerns. Not everything is perfect in these young developing international Agreements.
[1] Peter Mandelson EU Trade Commissioner: Biotechnology and the EU European Biotechnology Info Day Bavarian Representation, Brussels, 14 June 2007
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/07/397
&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
14.06.2007: Late sequelae of agent orange defoliant herbicide in Vietnam made by Monsanto and Dow [1]
The
Vietnamese Association of Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin (VAVA) will
launch their appeal at a federal court opening on 18 June 2007 in New
York against 37 US companies that produced Agent Orange, a poisonous
defoliant that the US army showered forests and rice paddies with
during its war against Vietnam.
An estimated 11 million gallons
of Agent Orange were dumped on Vietnam from 1961 to 1971 by the US
military and the US-backed South Vietnamese regime.
The herbicide
has been discovered to contain the carcinogen dioxin – one of the most
toxic compounds known to man. It has been linked to cancer and serious
birth defects.
VAVA presented a claim against 37 companies who produced Agent Orange, among them being Dow Chemical and Monsanto, in January 2004.
The claim specifies that the production of dioxin and other toxic substances used as weapons by US military forces against Vietnam has a direct link with extreme health problems and deformities of three millions of people in this country.
In 2005, VAVA’s initial case was rejected as the court determined there were no legal grounds for the trial.
The US has compensated its own army veterans who have developed certain cancers since serving in Vietnam, but little has been done for the Vietnamese.
In
1999, 20,000 South Koreans filed a lawsuit in Korea and in January
2006, the Korean Appeals Court ordered Monsanto and Dow to pay $62
million in compensation to about 6,800 Koreans.
The Hai Bluhm, a
Vietnamese person seeking asylum in Potsdam, Germany is heavily signed
by agent orange. He is one of the witnesses which will be heard by the
court. The appeal is launched against the chemical factories of the
defoliant because the constitution of the united States of America does
not allow in this case action lawsuit to be been filed against the US
Government. [2]
[1] Thanhnien News: Public support raised for Agent Orange lawsuit
http://www.thanhniennews.com/features/?catid=10&newsid=28991
[2] Spiegel Online: Todesregen, Prozessflut und ein Tropfen Hoffnung. Marina Mai. 14.06.2007.
http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/0,1518,488299,00.html
14.06.2007 Pre-storage treatment reduces scald losses on organic apple[1]
Low-oxygen
atmosphere for seven days at 20°C prior to cold storage extends shelf
life of organic fruit and vegetable according to Edna Pesis. Only 10%
of apples were lost due to scald after 8 month of cold storage. Pesis
says that ware which had not been pre-storage treated was completely
lost under the same condition.
According to the article of Pesis published in the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and reported on in Chemistry & Industry, storage of avocados, tomatoes and other organic produce may profit from this technique.
Conventional produce can be treated with chemicals, but no artificial chemicals are used for organics during processing. Treatment of organic apples with a solution of the antioxidant diphenylamine (DPA) is being used for years to reduce scald. This treatment may now be substituted by the none-chemical pre-storage treatment of Pesis.
[1] Foodnavigator: Oxygen treatment found to extend shelf life. 11.06.2007
http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/ng.asp?id=77240
13.06.2007 Protein and vaccines from methane from the North Sea fields. [1]
The
Norway company Norferm in Tiedbergodden expands its capacity 8 000 to
40 000 t/year of bioprotein using methane gas from Heidrun field in the
Norwegian Sea as raw ware. [1]
The BioProtein from Norferm is
produced by fermentation of methane, oxygen, ammonia and minerals
together with methanotrophic bacteria Methylococcus capsulatus. The
resulting product contains 70% of crude protein and can be used as feed
for chicken, swine, pets an fish. [2]
The University of Bergen,
together with Norferm developed the technology of the fermenter of
methane. Other projects are running to bring Methylocuccus capsulatus
to produce oral vaccines. [3]
Methane a greenhouse gas.[4]
Methane
(CH4) is a greenhouse gas that remains in the atmosphere for
approximately 9-15 years. Methane is over 20 times more effective in
trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide (CO2) over a
100-year period and is emitted from a variety of natural and
human-influenced sources. Human-influenced sources include landfills,
natural gas and petroleum systems, agricultural activities, coal
mining, stationary and mobile combustion, wastewater treatment, and
certain industrial process.
Methane is also a primary constituent
of natural gas and an important energy source. As a result, efforts to
prevent or utilize methane emissions can provide significant energy,
economic and environmental benefits.
[1] Robert Winder: Methane to biomass. Cheistry and Industry 06 Septempmber 2004 Issue 17 p 19
http://www.chemind.org/CI/searchresults.jsp
[2] Norferm: BioProtein. A single cell protein from methane
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=3&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biotekforum.no
%2Fpublic%2Fdocuments%2Fevent%2F130%2FPresentasjon%2520Gunnar%2520Kleppe
%2C%2520Norferm.ppt&ei=oTRwRvyYJZHuQarnvZ8D&usg=AFQjCNEy
_lBM9jlgJipYnxPNMgaBqqsHGA&sig2=pDyO-08GOIWzcutQE9-Ehg
[3] University of Bergen: Exploiting a gaseating bacteria
http://www.uib.no/elin/elpub/uibmag/en02/bacteria.html
[4] US EPA: Methane
http://www.epa.gov/methane/
13.06.2007: Leptin in new UK baby food [1]
UK
will launche a new infant formula with leptin intended to protect from
obesity and diabetes into adulthood. Leptin is present in milk but not
in infant formulas. Adding leptin could restore natural composition of
baby food.
Researcher Claire J. Stocker and colleagues 2007 found
that leptin supplements to rats early in life offers permanent
protection against obesity and diabetes in adulthood. [2]
According to the researchers leptin's role in infancy hardwires the body's energy balance settings. They believe that the decision to be fat or thin may even be made before birth, during pregnancy. Offspring of leptin-treated mothers remain lean even when fed a fat-laden diet. The researchers want to extend this to the pet market to avoid diabetic and fat dogs and cats. [1]
Leptin
is produced by the placenta. Leptin levels rise during pregnancy and
fall at parturition. A supplementation of leptin during pregnacy is
therefore not necessary [3]
Although leptin is a circulating
signal that reduces appetite, in general, obese people have an
unusually high circulating concentration of leptin. These people are
said to be resistant to the effects of leptin, in much the same way
that people with type 2 diabetes are resistant to the effect on
insulin. Thus, obesity develops when people take in more energy than
they use over a prolonged period of time, and this excess food intake
is not driven by hunger signals, occurring in spite of the
anti-appetite signals from circulating leptin. The high sustained
concentrations of leptin from the enlarged fat stores result in the
cells that respond to leptin becoming desensitized. [4]
[1] The
Society of Chemical IndustryNew formula for fit future. Baby food
offering lifetime protection against obesity could be in the
supermarket soon, Lisa Melton reports. Chemistry & Industry magazin
http://www.soci.org/SCI/general/2007/html/ge610.jsp
[2]Stocker,
Claire J.; Wargent, Ed; O'Dowd, Jackeline; Cornick,Claire; Speakman,
John R.; Arch, Jonathan R.S.; Cawthorne, Michael A.: Prevention of
diet-induced obesity and impaired glucose
tolerance in rats
following administration of leptin to their mothers. American Journal
of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology doi:
10.1152/ajpregu.00676.2006
http://ajpregu.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/292/5/R1810
[3]
Zhao J, Townsend KL, Schulz LC, Kunz TH, Li C, Widmaier EP (2004).
"Leptin receptor expression increases in placenta, but not
hypothalamus, during gestation in Mus musculus and Myotis lucifugus".
Placenta 25 (8-9): 712–22.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15450389
[4] Wikipedia, the free enzyclopedia: Leptin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leptin
12.06.2007: Detection of L and D amino acids to study modified composition of new GM plants. [1]
Miguel
Herrero and colleagues 2007 presented a new technique detecting
significant differences % D-aa values for the different
conventional varieties (Aristis, Tietar, and PR33P66 maize).
The
transgenic maize Tietar-Bt with the new inserted Cry1Ab transgene
presented % D-aa values which were similar to conventional maize
Trietar. According to the authors this indicates that, in these maize
samples, no metabolic pathway were modified in Trietar-BT.
The
method is based on changes of the “L” or “D” form of amino acid (the so
called chiral amino acids). Such changes may affect nutritional quality
and digestibility. The method combines micellar electrokinetic
chromatography with a chiral selector and laser-induced fluorescence to
investigate the prevalence of L- and D-amino acids.
The authors suggest this new method to be used as proof of substantial equivalence of GM maize and conventional plants.
[1]
Herrero, Miguel; Ibanez, Elena; Martin-Alvarez, Pedro J.; Cifuentes,
Alejandro: Analysis of Chiral Amino Acids in Conventional and
Transgenic Maize Analytical Chemistry; 2007; ASAP Article; DOI:
10.1021/ac070454f
http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/searchRedirect.cgi/ancham/asap/abs/ac070454f.html
12.06.2007: China stops bio ethanol production from food and starts using Lignin and cellulose as raw material[1]
Biofuels
are currently manufactured from food crops including corn, wheat,
sugar, cassava, sweet sorghum, and oilseeds.The Chinese government
fears shortage of food in these items due to biofuel demand which could
increase food prices and issued a moratorium on these sources.
China
produces about one million tons of Ethanol annually from three million
tons of corn. Non-food crops, such as cassava and drought-tolerant
sweet sorghum will now have to be used for the production of
bio-ethanol.
Due to the great demand, China imports cassava from Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia
Lignocellulose ethanol plant in China [2]
Cellulosic
ethanol can be produced from almost any organic matter, including
agricultural waste, grasses, sewage, sludge, switchgrass, plant stalks,
trees and straw. Cellulose and lignin cannot be digested by humans, the
production of cellulose does not compete with the production of food.
Transforming them into ethanol using efficient and cost effective
hemi(cellulase) enzymes or other processes might provide as much as 30%
of the current fuel consumption in the US—and probably similar figures
in other oil-importing regions like China or Europe.
There are two ways to produce ethanol from cellulose:
1.Cellulolysis
processes which consist of hydrolysis on pretreated lignocellulosic
materials followed by fermentation and distillation.
2.Gasification
that transforms the linocellulosic raw material into gaseous carbon
monoxide and hydrogen. They are then fed into a special kind of
fermenter or to a catalyst bed.
They both include fermentation and distillation as final steps.
[1]FoodNavigator: China blocks food for biofuel
http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/ng.asp?n=77283-ethanol-biofuels-corn
[2] Wikipedia, the free enzyclopedia: Cellulosic ethanol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellulosic_ethanol
12.06.2007: Trans Fat Holdouts Remain in Supermarkets, Despite Labelling [1]
Though
trans fat-labeling rules spurred many companies to remove most of the
partially hydrogenated oil from most of their processed foods, hundreds
of foods still contain the discredited,
heart-attack-inducing ingredient, according to a limited supermarket survey conducted by the nonprofit Center for Science in the Public Interest.
Since
2004, CSPI has been urging the FDA to prohibit the use of partially
hydrogenated oils in food. Unfortunately, though, the agency that took
ten long years just to include trans fat on food labels hasn’t taken
action on CSPI’s petition. While the FDA rejected CSPI’s petition to
require restaurants to disclose the presence of trans fat and still
considers the ingredient “generally recognized as safe,” out, but those
measures exempt packaged foods sold in their original wrappers.
Meanwhile
The States of New York City; Philadelphia; Montgomery County, Maryland;
and Brookline, Massachusetts working on their own require restaurants
to phase out their use of partially hydrogenated oils
According to CSPI executive director Michael F. Jacobson everyone
is so used to seeing “0g Trans Fat” claims on food labels that it’s
tempting to think the problem is solved. While labeling has been a
great success, it clearly hasn’t been enough to get every company on
board for every product.
The American Heart Association says
Americans should consume no more than 2 grams of trans fat per day,
which is about as much as someone would get from naturally occurring
trans fat.
Alternatives to trans fatty acids [2]
Frying
with soya oil which is not hydrogenated reduces the shelf life
considerably because of the high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids
which are readily oxidised. Using rape seed oil also known as canola,
solves this problem. Rape seed oil is similar to the Mediterranean
olive oil. It has plenty of monounsaturated fatty acids which are less
reactive with oxygen. Change from hydrogenated soy oil to rape seed oil
or fractionated palmoil and reduction of desodorising temparature
during refining of edible oil and fats solves the problem.
The
phase out of trans- fatty acids in Europe was completed in just a few
years. FDA, however does not move, while the government of States and
many enterprises like Unilever banned trans-fatty acids.
The
retailer chains are in the responsibility to look after food safety of
the products they sell and should demand trans-fatty acid status of the
produces they deliver.
The consumer should reject all products which are not labelled as trans-free.
The FDA Guide [2]
Trans
fatty acids should be listed as "Trans fat" or "Trans" on a separate
line under the listing of saturated fat in the nutrition label. Trans
fat content must be expressed as grams per serving to the nearest
0.5-gram increment below 5 grams and to the nearest gram above 5
grams., the content, when declared, must be expressed as "0 g."
FDA
issued a final rule on July 11, 2003 (68 FR 41434) to require food
labels to bear the gram amount of trans fat Any product that is
initially introduced into interstate commerce on or after January 1,
2006 must be labeled with trans fat. Sources of trans fat include
partially hydrogenated oil and some animal-based foods. Examples of
exemptions are discussed by the FDA. [3]
According
to the CSPI labelling was a good thing, but the FDA should finish the
job and begin a regulatory process that would phase out partially
hydrogenated oils altogether, or limit their use to minuscule amounts.
[1] CSPI: Trans Fat Holdouts Remain in Supermarkets, Despite Labeling
http://www.cspinet.org/new/200706112.html
[2] OurFood: Food What is it?: Deep frying oil and shortenings
http://www.ourfood.com/Food_what_is_it.html
[3]
Food Labelling: Trans Fatty Acids in Nutrition Labelling, Nutrient
Content Claims, and Health Claims Small Entity Compliance Guide.
December 30, 2005
http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/transgui.html
[4] Requesting an Extension to Use Existing Label Stock after the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date of January 1, 2006
http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/transgu3.html
10.06.2007: Vitamin D3 and calcium supplementation reduces all-cancer risk in women [1]
Joan
M. Lappe and colleagues in a study of supplementation of 1,400-1,500 mg
calcium and 1,100 IU vitamin D3 over 4 years the calcium/vitamin D3
group experienced a 60 per cent decrease in their cancer risk compared
to the group taking placebos, but did not change significantly for the
group receiving only calcium.
The authors concluded that mproving
calcium and vitamin D nutritional status substantially reduces
all-cancer risk in postmenopausal women.
[1] Lappe, Joan M.;
Travers-Gustafson, Dianne; Davies, K. Michael; Recker, Robert R.; and
Heaney, Robert P.: Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer
risk: results of a randomized trial. American Journal of Clinical
Nutrition. June 8, Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages 1586-1591
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/85/6/1586
10.06.2007: Green Tea reduces colorectal cancer risk in women. [1]
Tea
and its constituents have shown anticarcinogenic activities in in vitro
and animal studies. Epidemiologic studies, however, have been
inconsistent.
Green tea contains between 30 and 40 per cent of
water-extractable polyphenols, such as epigallocatechin gallate,
epigallocatechin, epicatechin gallate, and epicatechin., while black
tea contains between 3 and 10 per cent.
Gong Yang assessed green tea consumption and colorectal cancer risk and rectal cancers.
The
researchers found an inverse dose-response relationship between the
amount of tea consumed and duration in years of lifetime tea
consumption This study suggests that regular consumption of green tea
may reduce colorectal cancer risk in women.
Comment of OurFood: Drinking
green tea without sugar is delicious. Ice-green tea without sugar or
sweetener is excellent to avoid thirst on a hot summer day. For those
who cannot live without sweetness added orange juice fits the taste.
Avoid these industrial ice-teas with plenty of sugar and
fructose-glucose syrup caloric bombs . Green tea should always
preferred to black tea. Enzymatic activity destroyed most of the black
tea polyphenols which are still present in green tea.
Yang,
Gong; Shu, Xiao-Ou; Li, Honglan; Chow, Wong-Ho; Ji, Bu-Tian; Zhang,
Xianglan; Gao, Yu-Tng and Zheng, Wei: Prospective Cohort Study of Green
Tea Consumption and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Women. Cancer
Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. Volume 16, Pages 1219-1223,
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0097
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/16/6/1219
10.06.2007: Obesity control reducing energy density of foods [1]
Julia
Ello-Martin and colleagues 2007 assessed as reduction diet the
reduction of fat compared with the reduction of fat added with higher
intake of fruits and vegetables during 1 year.
For both groups no goals for energy or fat intake were assigned; the participants could eat ad libitum.
The
low fat and high intake of fruits and vegetables group, had a lower
dietary energy density,a higher weight loss (7,9 kg/1 y), and less
hunger than did the low fat group (6,4 kg/1y) with variation of +- 0,9
kg for both.
The authors concluded that the reduction of dietary energy density, combining increased fruit and vegetable intakes with decreased fat intake, is an effective strategy for managing body weight.
Commentary of OurFood: Reducing
fat in dairy products, convenience foods and fried products such as
french fryies fish sticks, croissants, forget about oily dressings and
sugar-glucose energy bars to sweeten your calories, adding fruits and
vegetables to your menu is the right way.
Instead of roasting lean
beef or chicken breast in your pan using plenty of oil, you can cook it
using water and zero oil. Gourmet add some wine instead of water. If
you add a tomato salad on vinegar you meet the Juilia Ello-Martin
specifications.
[1] Ello-Martin, Julia A.; Roe, Liane S.;
Ledikwe, Jenny H.; Beach, Amanda M. and Rolls, Barbara J.: Dietary
energy density in the treatment of obesity: a year-long trial comparing
2 weight-loss diets. Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, Jun 2007; 85: 1465 -
1477.
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/85/6/1465?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=1586&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&volume=85&issue=6&resourcetype=HWCIT
10.06.2007: Contaminants in food [1]
The European Commission noted on the 7. June 2007 what has been undertaken to reduce contaminants in food.
According
to the definition adopted by the EU, contaminants are substances that
have not been intentionally added to food. These substances may be
present in food as a result of the various stages of its production,
packaging, transport or holding. They also might result from
environmental contamination.
Some contaminants have already studied by food safety authorities, such as mycotoxins (aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, fusarium-toxins, patulin), metals (cadmium, lead, mercury, inorganic tin), dioxins and PCBs, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), 3-MCPD and nitrates.
Ongoing investigations are:
Acrylamide
- The Commission will collect data concerning surveys of acrylamide
made by member states over three years between 2007 and 2009. [2]
Organotins
- chemicals which can be found in water systems due to their presence
in paints as anti-biofouling agents e.g. used on the hulls of ships and
marine apparatus. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has issued
an opinion on the health risks to consumers associated with exposure to
organotins in foodstuffs. Scientific Committee on Health and
Environmental Risks (SCHER) has recently adopted an opinion on the
risks to health and the environment associated with the use of 4
organotin compounds. In this opinion food and non-food exposure routes
were assessed. More informations are available at the EFSA opinion,
SCOOP Report [3]
Furan -
has been identified in a number of foodstuffs that undergo heat
treatment such as canned and jarred foodstuffs. A report on provisional
findings on furan in food has been compiled by EFSA. [4] EFSA is
currently collecting more data on furan .e.g. on its mode of formation,
levels in food and toxicity. [5]
Ethyl carbamate -
a compound that can naturally occur in fermented foods and beverages.
It often occurs in alcoholic beverages (in particular stone fruit
brandies). Ethyl carbamate is formed by ethanol and certain precursors
in the fruit mash under the influence of light during the distillation
process. EFSA is currently collecting data on the presence of ethyl
carbamate.
[1]EU Commission, Food Safety from Farm to Fork: News Archive: Contaminants of food. 07.06.2007
http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/chemicalsafety/contaminants/index_en.htm
[2]
Commission Recommendation of 3 May 2007 on the monitoring of acrylamide
levels in food (notified under document number C(2007) 1873)
http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/chemicalsafety/contaminants/ciaa_acrylamide_toolbox.pdf
[3]
EFSA opinion, SCOOP Report Assessment of the dietary exposure to
organotin compounds of the population of the EU Member States
http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/chemicalsafety/contaminants/scoop_3-2-13_final_report
_organotins_en.pdf
[4] EFSA Report of the CONTAM Panel on provisional findings on furan in food. 22 December 2004.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/contam/contam_documents/760.html
[5] Recommendations on the monitoring of the presence of furan in foodstuffs.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32007H0196:EN:NOT
09.06.2007: Bitter apricot kernel warning [1]
The
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment says that bitter apricot
kernels can lead to poisoning. These kernels are being sold
increasingly on the Internet. In some cases it is claimed that they can
help to fight cancer.[2] However, there is no scientific evidence to
back this claim. [3] [4]
According to the German Federal
Institute for Risk Assessmenuite bitter apricot kernels have a high
natural level of amygdalin. During digestion hydrocyanic acid is
released from the glycoside which can lead to severe, acute poisoning.
At high doses it can even prove fatal. Hence, bitter apricot kernels
may involve health risks. Eating just a few kernels can already lead to
the onset of acute poisoning symptoms. [1]
Consumers should not,
therefore, eat more than one or two bitter apricot kernels a day or
even none at all for precautionary reasons. Unsubstantiated health
claims, which could encourage desperate sick people to buy them, are
irresponsible. [1]
Amygdalin (called here vitamin B17)has been studied by FDA in USA and found useless to fight cancer.[5]
The
claim cancer cells have within them an enzyme which unlocks the poison
in the amygdalin, and in this way the cancer cells are destroyed.
Normal, healthy cells do not have this enzyme. Is not backed by any
study. [4]
Acute cyanide intoxications may arise from eating
apricot kernels, choke cherries, and other stone fruit kernels with
high concentrations of cyanogenic glycosides. Inadequately prepared
cassava, when constituting the major part of the diet, may be
hazardous. Amygdalin is also present in some sorts of cassava [5]
[1] German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment BfR: Bitter apricot kernels can lead to poisoning
http://www.bfr.bund.de/cd/template/index_en
[2] CEM Food.C. Ltd:
http://www.apricotkernels.org/main.htm
[3] Bertsche T, Schulz M; 2003. Amygdalin – ein neues altes Krebsmittel?, Pharmazeutische Zeitung.
www.pharmazeutische-zeitung.de/fileadmin/pza/2003-24/pharm4.htm
[4] National Cancer Institute, USA, 2005.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/laetrile/healthprofessional
[5] WHO: Hydrogen Cyanade and Cyanides: Human Health Aspects.
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2004/9241530618.pdf
09.06.2007: Wheat-based glucose syrups including dextrose not of allergen concern [1]
Since
wheat is relevant both as a source of epitopes known to induce coeliac
disease and as a source of allergens triggering wheat allergy, it is
appropriate to investigate wheat products, namely wheat starch
hydrolysates, for their potential to induce coeliac disease or trigger
wheat allergy.
The Association des Amidonneries de Cereales de
l´Union Europeenne AAC provides information on wheat starch
hydrolysates, particularly concerning the potential effects of
wheat-based glucose syrups including dextrose in coeliac disease and
wheat allergy. The history of safe use of wheat-based glucose syrups
including dextrose is claimed based on the safe use of wheat
starch-based gluten-free diet in coeliac disease. .
Wheat-based
glucose syrups including dextrose may contain low levels of proteins
and peptides. It is not known at which levels of intake glucose syrups
including dextrose would cause allergic reactions in wheat-allergic
individuals. Nevertheless, taking into account all the scientific
information provided and in particular the levels of wheat proteins
reported in glucose syrups including dextrose, the Panel considers that
it is not very likely that this product will trigger a severe allergic
reaction in susceptible individuals.
For coeliac disease,
assessment of the evidence provided including a new clinical study
indicates that wheat-based glucose syrup is unlikely to cause an
adverse reaction in individuals with coeliac disease provided that the
(provisional) value of gluten considered by Codex Alimentarius for
foods rendered gluten-free is not exceeded.
The Codex Standard
for Gluten-Free Foods (Codex Stan 118-1983) specifies that the nitrogen
content of food ingredients derived from gluten containing cereals may
not exceed 0.05 g per 100 g on a dry basis (or 0.31 % protein/ds,
Nx6.25), when they are used in a gluten-free food. [2]
[1]
EFSA: Opinion of the NDA Panel related to a notification from AAC on
wheat-based glucose syrups including dextrose pursuant to Article 6,
paragraph 11 of Directive 2000/13/EC. 6.6.2007.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/nda/nda_opinions/food_allergy/ej488
_glucose_syrups.html
[2] Codex Stan 118 Standard for Gulte-Free Foods 1983
http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/standards/291/CXS_118e.pdf
09.06.2007: D-apha tocopherols, phytosterols and phytosterol esters derived from soybean oil not of allergen concern [1] [2]
Soy
is a common dietary constituent and allergic reactions to soy proteins
are well described. Soy allergy prevalence studies are lacking,
estimated prevalences are about 0.5% in the general population with
about 3-6% of allergic children being allergic to soy proteins.
Clinical reactions are similar to those observed with other major food
allergens, such as milk, egg or peanut and include systemic
anaphylaxis.
The ADM and Cargill asked for an exemption of
allergy warning for natural mixed tocopherols (vitamin E, E306) and a
range of D-alpha tocopherols acetate and succinate derived from
vegetable oil (soybean oil). Natural mixed tocopherols are mainly used
as antioxidants in fatty foods at a concentration of about 50 mg/kg
(referring to the fat fraction of the specific food). Natural mixed
tocopherols are also used as dietary supplements.
The
application covers phytosterol esters produced from vegetable oil
(soybean oil). Phytosterol esters are currently commercially available
in selected foods in several EU countries. The EU regulations limit
exposure to a maximum of 3 grams per day of phytosterols through
labelling requirements and maximum concentrations in certain food
categories in order to avoid intakes above the recommended limits from
multiple sources of intake. Plant sterols under consideration are
derived from soybean oil deodorised distillates.
Considering the
information provided by the applicant regarding the starting material,
the subsequent production process, and the demonstration of low
residual protein content, the Panel of the European Food Safety
Authority considers that it is unlikely that natural mixed
tocopherol/D-alpha tocopherols from soybean sources and vegetable oils
derived phytosterols and phytosterol esters from soybean sources will
trigger a severe allergic reaction in susceptible individuals.
The mixed tocopherols from soybean will therefore exempted from labelling of allergy warning
[1]
EFSA: Opinion of the NDA Panel related to a notification from Cognis,
ADM and Cargill on natural mixed tocopherols (E306), natural D-alpha
tocopherol, natural D-alpha tocopherol acetate and natural D-alpha
tocopherol succinate from soybean sources pursuant to Article 6,
paragraph 11 of Directive 2000/13/EC. 6.6.2007
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/nda/nda_opinions/food_allergy/ej485
_tocopherols.html
[2]
EFSA: Opinion of the NDA Panel related to a notification from Cognis,
ADM and Cargill on vegetable oils-derived phytosterols and phytosterol
esters from soybean sources pursuant to Article 6 paragraph 11 of
Directive 2000/13/EC. 6.6.2007
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/nda/nda_opinions/food_allergy/ej486
_phytosterols.html
09.06.2007: Mustard seed oil (allyl isothiocyanate) not exempted from labelling as allergen [1]
Mustard and products thereof are included in the list of the Annex IIIa of the Directive 2003/89/EC [2].
Manufacturing process of mustard oil
Mustard
seed from Brassica juncea are ground, tap water is added and the slurry
is incubated at 50°C for 30 minutes. The allyl isothiocyanate is
released from its precursor by the enzyme myrosinase. The oil is
obtained by steam distillation under reduced pressure. The mustard oil
is separated from water by centrifugation and dried with sodium
sulphate and filtered.
Allergic reactions of mustard
Mustard
is known to trigger allergic reactions or intolerances in sensitive
individuals and was therefore included in this list and must be
labelled..
International Flavours & Fragrances (IFF) requested
the European Commission exempt mustard oil from labelling European Food
Safety Authority to evaluate the scientific data and came to the
following conclusion:
Arguments of IFF regarding safety of mustard seed oil
IFF
claims that mustard seed oil is not likely to trigger adverse reactions
on the basis of two arguments: 1) the typical low levels of mustard oil
in foods, and 2) the in vitro demonstration that proteins are not
present in amounts higher than 1.5 microg/g in five samples of mustard
seed oil analysed with an ELISA test developed by the applicant.
The
applicant did not take into account the known toxicity of allyl
isothiocyanate and its role in causing allergic contact dermatitis, or
the possibility that proteins not detectable with the ELISA test could
cause an IgE-mediated reaction (Lerbaek et al., 2004; Kohl and Frosch,
1990).
The main volatile component of mustard seed oil is allyl
isothiocyanate (97-100%). which has been classified as toxic by
inhalation, in contact with the skin and if swallowed, and irritating
to eyes, respiratory system and skin
Allergic reactions to mustard, including severe anaphylactic reactions, are well documented in
clinical and laboratory studies. Mustard allergy may account for 1-7% of all food allergies with
regional variations.
Mustard
allergens are resistant to heat and to enzymatic degradation, and
therefore are not markedly affected by food processing. The major
mustard allergens identified are Sin a 1, belonging to the 2S
albumin
family, and Bra j 1, also from the 2S albumin family, with a MW . A new
major allergen in mustard seeds has been recently isolated and
identified, an 11S globulin called Sin a 2 with a MW of 51 kDa
(Palomares et al., 2005), but not all mustard allergens and their
occurrence in different species are known. [3] [4]
In addition, allyl isothiocyanate is a major skin-sensitizing agent (non IgE-mediated mechanism),
Mustard
protein allergic individuals may react to the protein content of the
oil. Individuals sensitised to the skin-sensitising component allyl
isothiocyanate may react to oil even in the absence of mustard proteins
(Lerbaek, 2004).
Conclusions
Taking
account of the potential allergen content and well documented clinical
allergic reactions in individuals sensitive to mustard (NDA, 2004a), it
is appropriate for the Panel to assess the likelihood that mustard seed
oil may cause an allergic reaction in mustard-allergic individuals.
Mustard oil (allyl isothiocyanate) will therefore not be exempted from labelling as allergen.
[1]
Opinion of the Scientific Panel NDA related to a notification from IFF
on mustard seed oil pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 11 of Directive
2000/13/EC.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/nda/nda_opinions/food_allergy/nda_op_ej481
_mustardseedoil.html
[2]
Directive 2003/89/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of
10 November 2003 amending Directive 2000/13/EC as regards indication of
the ingredients present in foodstuffs.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:308:0015:0018:EL:PDF
[3]
NDA (Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies)
(2004a). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products,
Nutrition and Allergies on a request from the Commission relating to
the evaluation of allergenic foods for labelling purposes. The EFSA
Journal 32, 1-197.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/nda/nda_opinions/food_allergy/341.html
[4]
NDA (Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies)
(2004b). Opinion of the NDA Panel related to a notification from IFF on
mustard seed oil pursuant to Article 6 paragraph 11 of Directive
2000/13/EC. The EFSA Journal 157, 1-6.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/nda/nda_opinions/food_allergy/764.html
08.06.2007:
Calcium supplements and excessive consumption of dairy products may
increase the risk of prostate cancer in smokers, according to a study
related to the ATBC study [1]
Calcium is reported to be
the biggest seller supplement claiming that high dietary intakes of
calcium and dairy products reduce prostate cancer risk.
Mitrou
and colleagues 2007 in a study concerning dietary intakes of calcium
and dairy products in relation to risk of prostate cancer in the
Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene (ATBC) Cancer Prevention Study in
smokers, found that calcium intake of more than 2,000 mg/day was
associated with a marked increase in prostate cancer risk. Total dairy
intake was also positively associated with risk of prostate cancer, but
eliminating calcium from the data no risk of prostate cancer was found
being calcium the pro-cancer agent of dairy products.
According
to the authors intake of calcium or some related component contained in
dairy foods is associated with increased prostate cancer risk.
[1]
Mitrou, Panagiota N.; Albanes, Demetrius; Weinstein, Stephanie J.;
Pietinen, Pirjo; Taylor, Philip R.; Virtamo, Jarmo; Leitzmann, Michael
F.: A prospective study of dietary calcium, dairy products and prostate
cancer risk (Finland). International Journal of Cancer. DOI:
10.1002/ijc.22553 Published Online: 2 Feb 2007 1 June 2007, Volume120,
Issue 11, Pages: 2466-2473
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/114110091/ABSTRACT
08.06.2007: Desert Locust [1]
Yemen
is facing its worst Desert Locust outbreak since 1993, FAO warned on 6
June 2007. An intensive survey and aerial control campaign using
helicopters needs to be mounted to avoid massive locust infestations
and serious damage to food crops.
If locust infestations are not
controlled in time, agricultural crops in Wadi Hadhramaut and other
areas including the Sana’a highlands will be at risk
Locusts are
migratory grasshoppers that often travel in vast swarms. A Desert
Locust lives about three to five months. The life cycle comprises three
stages: egg hopper and adult.
Eggs hatch in about two weeks,
hoppers develop in five to six stages over a period of about 30-40
days, and adults can mature within three weeks. Swarms can travel from
5 to 130 kilometres or more in a day with the wind.
A Desert
Locust adult can consume roughly its own weight in fresh food per day
-- about two grams. A very small part of an average swarm eats the same
amount of food in one day as about 500 people.
Control [2]
The
Desert Locust is a difficult pest to control. Early warning and
preventive control is the strategy adopted by locust affected countries
in Africa and Asia to try to stop locust plagues from developing and
spreading.FAOsDesert Locust Information Service (DLIS) in Rome, Italy
monitors the weather, ecological conditions and the locust situation on
a daily basis.Results and warnings are available on the FAOs Locust
Watch web site. FAO also provides information.
An ecological method
to control Desert Locust is with natural enemies. These include
predatory anand parasitic wasps and flies, predatory beetle larvae,
birds and reptiles, but are not sufficient to control great swarms
Another old African method is by putting poisonous or aromatic plants
next to the crop they are trying to protect.
Organophosphate [2]
At
present the primary method of controlling desert locust infestations is
with organophosphate insecticides applied in small concentrated doses
by vehicle-mounted and aerial sprayers. The insecticide must be applied
directly to the insect.
Biopesticides include fungi, bacteria,
neem extract and pheromones. The effectiveness of many biopesticides
equals that of conventional chemical pesticides. They are usually
harmless to other creatures and the environment.
Biological control [2]
A
biological control product is Green Muscle. It is based on a naturally
occurring entomopathogenic fungus which is a fungus which infects
fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum This fungus infects many
groups of insects. It is harmless to humans and other mammals and
birds. It is recommended for use mainly against hoppers, the wingless
early stages of locusts. it allows the natural enemies of locusts and
grasshoppers to continue their beneficial work. Biopesticides are also
safer to use in environmentally sensitive areas such as national parks
or near rivers and other water bodies.
Green Muscle was developed under the LUBILOSA project Pathogens have the advantage that they can be produced in artificial culture in large quantities and be used with ordinary spraying equipment. The fungal spores are sprayed in oil. Oil-based formulations allow the application of fungal spores under dry conditions such as found in deserts.
Most insects living near the soil have evolved natural defenses against entomopathogenic fungi like M. anisopliae. This fungus is therefore locked in an evolutionary battle to overcome these defenses, which has led to a large number of strains that are adapted to certain groups of insects. Some strains are so specific that they have attained variety status, like Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum, which almost exclusively infects grasshoppers.[3]
The
use of Metarhizium anisopliaein the control of malaria mosquitos
coating mosquito nets or cotton sheets attached to the wall with
them.is under investigation. [3]
[1] Yemen is facing worst locust outbreak in nearly 15 years
http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2007/1000590/index.html
[2] Wikipedia, the free enzyclopedia: Desert locust
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert_locust
[3] Wikipedia, the free enzyclopedia: Metarhizium anisopliae
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metarhizium_anisopliae
07.06.2007: Heptachlor in feed with fishmeal[1]
According
to the EFSA Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain
heptachlor was commercially introduced as a non-systemic contact
insecticide in 1945. It was also a major constituent (about 10 %) of
technical chlordane. Heptachlor was used for agricultural purposes,
soil and seed treatment, wood protection and termite- and household
insect control. It has been banned for use in the European Union since
1984 and in most other countries worldwide because of the persistency
in the environment of the two break-down products heptachlor epoxide
and photoheptachlor.
All these compounds are lipophilic and particularly heptachlor epoxide and photoheptachlor tend to accumulate in the food chain.
Toxicity
Heptachlor
shows moderate acute toxicity and heptachlor epoxide and
photoheptachlor are more toxic than heptachlor. In mammals, the main
target organs are the nervous system and the liver, but also the
reproductive and the immune system are affected. Heptachlor and
heptachlor epoxide cause liver tumours in mice, but are not genotoxic.
Heptachlor is classified by IARC as possibly carcinogenic to humans
(group 2B). Heptachlor is moderately or highly toxic to fish exposed
via water, but no data from oral studies have been found.
Food chain
Amongst
the species studied, the domestic hen is the most sensitive species and
egg production and hatchability are the critical endpoints. Total
heptachlor (sum of heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide) is not frequently
found in feed commodities. When present, it is mostly in fish derived
products and only very infrequently in feed materials of plant origin.
Heptachlor epoxide is the predominant contaminant.
Human exposure to heptachlor
The
present dietary exposure of the adult population to total heptachlor is
below 1 ng/kg b.w. per day, which is two to three orders of magnitude
below the tolerable daily intake of 0.0001 mg/kg b.w. as established by
WHO in 2006.
Recommendations
To
reduce human exposure to heptachlor Scientific Panel on Contaminants in
the Food Chain recommends to increase surveillance of feed :
-
the Besides heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide, the analyses of feed
samples, especially of marine origin, should also include the
determination of photoheptachlor.
- In the clean-up of samples,
treatment with sulfuric acid must be avoided in order to prevent the
decomposition of the analytes.
- Inter-comparisons performed on
biological samples revealed large discrepancies in the performance of
laboratories, indicating scope for improvement of the analytical
methods.
- Toxicity and kinetic studies in fish exposed to
heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide via the diet are lacking and should
be conducted.
- The Members States are requested by the Commission
to report the results of their monitoring programmes on undesirable
substances in animal feed.
- Special attention should be paid to the
control of feed materials coming from areas of the world where
heptachlor has recently been or still is used.
[1] EFSA: Opinion
of the Scientific Panel CONTAM related heptachlor as an undesirable
substance in animal feed. Published 5 June 2007
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/contam/contam_opinions/ej478_heptachlor.html
07.06.2007: Bioavailability and food safety of L pidolic acid salts [1]
According
to the Scientific Panel AFC of the European Food Safety Authority, the
bioavailability of calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium and zinc are
absorbed from their L-pidolic acid salts is comparable to that from
other water-soluble and dissociable salts permitted to be used in food
supplements and foods intended for particular nutritional uses.
The
use of calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium and zinc L-pidolic acid
salts as source of these minerals for nutritional purposes to food
supplements is of no safety concern at the maximum use levels of
L-pidolic acid of 3 g/day.
[1] Opinion of the Scientific Panel
AFC related to Calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium and zinc L-pidolate
as sources for calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium and zinc added for
nutritional purposes to food supplements and to foods intended for
particular nutritional uses.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/afc/afc_opinions/ej495-503_pidolates.html
07.06.2007: Vaccination against avian influenza of H5 and H7 subtypes in domestic poultry and captive birds [1]
Control
measures of the HPAI strain of H5N1 are based on eradication of
infected flocks, but increasingly more countries supplement these
measures by the use of vaccination which is becoming important to
control and prevent the propagation of the disease.
The opinion
of the European Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare is
intended to support the Commission in the further developments of a
vaccination policy and was adopted on 11 May 2007.
According to
this opinion, the current EU authorised AI vaccines for poultry such as
chickens and ducks meet the relevant quality standards and are thus,
safe and effective to be used. However, for other poultry and captive
bird species the level of effectiveness of current AI vaccination is
not sufficiently known and therefore additional data on the
immunogenicity and effectiveness of current and future AI vaccines
should be generated.
In general, the use of AI vaccines in
poultry should be defined in advance dependant on the epidemiological
situation, geographical area and overall risk perception as a
preventive, emergency or in endemic situations.
Vaccination may
also reduce transmission of AI virus amongst captive and wild birds,
having also major benefits for animal welfare as vaccination will
prevent them from contracting the disease, death and from being culled
during eradication measures.
Silent spread of AI viruses can occur after vaccination, and therefore serological monitoring with
DIVA
based strategies will be required to detect AI virus transmission after
vaccination (shedding of the virus without presenting symptoms of the
disease).
Vaccination programmes using vaccines authorised by
the competent authority may reduce the potential for human and other
mammalian cases of HPAI, where the disease may become endemic. The use
of EU authorised vaccines per se is recommended because is safe and has
no negative effect on poultry products for consumers.
On the
evaluation of laboratory testing methods for surveillance of vaccinated
flocks (in particular DIVA strategy), it is concluded that to date only
conventional inactivated and recombinant live-vectored vaccines are
available for use and can be coupled with a suitable companion
diagnostic test.
An intrinsic problem of the DIVA principle is that infections with all AI subtypes (including non H5 and H7) may interfere.
The
"DIVA" (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals) a control
strategy for avian influenza infections in poultry is based on the use
of an inactivated oil emulsion vaccine containing the same
haemagglutinin (H) subtype as the challenge virus, but a different
neuraminidase (N). [2]
The
"ad hoc" serological test based on the detection of specific anti-N1
antibodies. "DIVA" control strategy may represent a tool for the
control of avian influenza infections in poultry to differentiate
between vaccinated and naturally infected birds. [2]
[1] Opinion
of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from
the Commission related with the vaccination against avian influenza of
H5 and H7 subtypes in domestic poultry and captive birds. Published 6
June 2007.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/etc/medialib/efsa/science/ahaw/ahaw_opinions/ej489_ai
_vaccines.Par.0002.File.dat/ahaw_op_ej489_AI_Vaccination_summary_en.pdf
[2]
Capua, I.; Terregino, C.; Cattoli, G.; Mutinelli, F.; Rodrigues, J.F.:
Development of a DIVA (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated
Animals) strategy using a vaccine containing a heterologous
neuraminidase for the control of avian influenza. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids
=12745380&dopt=Abstract
06.06.2007: Folic acid increases the risk of some types of tumours [1]
Bernard
Cole and colleagues 2007 found in a study that folate, when
administered as folic acid for up to six years, does not decrease the
risk of adenoma formation in the large intestine among individuals with
previously removed adenomas.
Another study by Schernhammer and colleagues 2007 (See www.ourfoo-news.com 03.06.2007: Supplements with vitamin B may be harmful) came to similar conclusion in relation to pancreatic cancer. [2]
In the study of Cole participants were randomly assigned to receive 1 mg/day of folic acid or placebo and to receive aspirin or placebo and were then examined three and six or eight years later.
The
researchers concluded that folic acid at 1 mg/d does not reduce
colorectal adenoma risk. Further research is needed to investigate the
possibility that folic acid supplementation might increase the risk of
colorectal neoplasia.
Cornelia Ulrich and John Potter in an
editorial said that folic acid promoted growth of carcinogenic lesions
and calls of health professionals to rely carefully on multiagent
chemoprevention and not to forget diet. [3]
The study of
Schernhammer and the study of Cole may be a warning for excessive
consumption of supplementation of the vitamin B group. Both studies
call for more studies.
Mandatory fortification of certain foods
with folic acid in the US and Canada were introduced in 1998 to reduce
the incidence of pregnancies affected by neural tube defects.
Andrew
Shao US dietary supplements industry association, the Council for
Responsible Nutrition (CRN) says that the benefits of folic acid are
well-documented, particularly in the area of reducing the risk of
neural tube birth defect. There is also promising scientific evidence
for folic acid in reducing the risk of congenital cardiovascular
defects, stroke and Alzheimer's disease. [4]
[1] Cole, B.;
Baron, J.; Sandler, R.; Haile, R.; Ahnen, D.; Bresalier,R.;
McKeown-Eyssen, G.; Summers, R.; Rothstein, R.; Burke, C.; Snover,D.;
Church, T.; Allen, J.; Robertson, D.; Beck, G.; Bond, J.; Byers, T.;
Mandel, J.; Mott, L.; Pearson, L.; Barry, E.; Rees, J.; Marcon, N.;
Saibil, F.; Magne Ueland, P.; Greenberg, E.: Folic Acid for the
prevention of colorectal adenomas. Journal of the American Medical
Association (JAMA) 6 June 2007, Volume 297, Issue 21, Pages 2351-2359
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/297/21/2351
[2] Schernhammer. Study on folate and pancreatic cancer
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/67/11/5553
[3]
Ulrich, Cornelia M.; Potter, John D.: Folate and Cancer - Timing is
everything. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 6 June
2007, Volume 297, Issue 21, Pages 2408-2409
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/297/21/2408
[4] CRN Emphasizes Importance of Folic Acid Benefits
http://www.crnusa.org/PR07_CRN_JAMA-FOLIC060707.html
06.06.2007: Antimicrobial drug-resistant Escherichia coli from humans and poultry products[1]
According
to Johnson and colleagues 2007 the food supply, including poultry
products, may transmit antimicrobial drug-resistant Escherichia coli to
humans. Drug-resistant human isolates from US population were
phylogenetic and virulence gene profile similar to poultry isolates,
and drug-susceptible and drug-resistant poultry isolates were largely
indistinguishable.
The
authors concluded that human-source drug-resistant fecal E. coli
isolates more likely originated in poultry than in humans, whereas
drug-resistant poultry isolates likely derive from drug-susceptible
poultry isolates. However, avoidance of poultry consumption may not
reliably provide personal protection.
[1] Johnson JR, Sannes MR,
Croy C, Johnston B, Clabots C, Kuskowski MA, et al.: Antimicrobial
drug-resistant Escherichia coli from humans and poultry products,
Minnesota and Wisconsin, 2002-2004. Emerg Infect Dis . 2007 Jun 6.
http://www.cdc.gov/eid/content/13/6/838.htm
06.06.2007 Acidification of the North sea induced by atmospheric CO2 [1]
Blackford
and Gilbert 2007 describe a coupled carbonate system–marine
ecosystem–hydrodynamic model. According to the researchers the
biological activity in the benthic, the region near the ground, as well
as pelagic, the deep water, is an important factor in this variability.
The
acidification of the region due to increased fluxes of atmospheric CO2
into the marine system is calculated and shown to exceed, on average,
0.1 pH units over the next 50 years and result in a total acidification
of 0.5 pH units below pre-industrial levels at atmospheric CO2
concentrations of 1000 ppm.
The potential for measurable changes
in biogeochemistry are demonstrated by simulating the observed
inhibition of pelagic nitrification with decreasing pH.
Scientists
believe that further decreased pH of the North Sea water will destroy
corals and biological system of the coastal and deeper regions.
[1]
Blackford, J.C.; Gilbert, F.J.: pH variability and CO2 induced
acidification in the North Sea. Journal of Marine Systems, Vol 64 Jan
2007 ppg 229-241
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science
06.06.2007: Human Alveolar Echinococcosis [1]
According
to Schweiger and colleagues 2007 human alveolar echinococcosis, a
hepatic disorder that resembles liver cancer, is a highly aggressive
and lethal zoonotic infection caused by the larval stage of the fox
tapeworm, Echinococcus multilocularis Humans and intermediate host
animals acquire the infection by ingesting E. multilocularis eggs in
contaminated food or water or by having close physical contact with
infected foxes, dogs, or host faeces.
Annual
incidence of human alveolar echinococcis increased recently in
zwitzerland.with fox population highly increasing. The authors warn
from an emerging epidemic of AE. Future trends will depend on the
intensity of present and future contamination of the environment with
E. multilocularis eggs as well as on the number of susceptible persons
exposed to the parasite.
Increasing fox population has increased the infection pressure for a large part of the human population such as coyotes in the United States and Canada, as suitable definitive host of E. multilocularis have become established in suburban areas with moderate to dense human populations, and other canids such as domestic dogs as definitive hosts.
The authors conclude that public health authorities in echinococcosis-endemic areas should establish coordinated systems of continuous surveillance and risk assessment, combined with measures to reduce illness and death from AE in human populations They suggest control strategies,such as deworming of foxes and other wild canids by using anthelminthic baiting. target suburban areas that have high human and wild canid population densities.
[1]
Schweiger A, Ammann RW, Candinas D, Clavien P-A, Eckert J, Gottstein B,
et al. Human alveolar echinococcosis after fox population increase,
Switzerland. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Jun 2007
http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/13/6/878.htm
06.06.2007: The role of meat and bone meal (MBM) in the epidemiology of BSE [1]
Mathilde
Paul and colleagues 2007 studied the role of meat and bone meal (MBM),
animal fat and dicalcium phosphate (DCP) after the feed ban on the risk
for BSE epidemics.
In
France, meat-and-bone meal (MBM) has been banned from cattle feed since
July 30, 1990. However, through January 1, 2007, 957 cases of bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) have been detected in cattle born after
the ban.
Meat bone meal (MBM)
According to the authors the source of infection in cattle born after the MBM ban still involves MBM. The BSE agent may have entered cattle feed by cross-contamination with feed for monogastric species (pigs and poultry) in which MBM was still authorized until November 2000. Cross-contamination could have occurred within factories, during feed delivery to the farm, or on mixed farms that have cattle and pigs or poultry. The authors raise the question of effectiveness of the ban that was initially restricted to bovines and belatedly extended to other species to reduce cross-contamination.
The
role of MBM as a source of BSE after the ban of MBM for cattle is well
documented through cross-contamination in feed factories. The authors
found that the total ban of MBM for farm animals in November 2000 was
essential for controlling the spread of BSE.
Other animal by products
Animal dicalcium phosphate (DCP)
According
to Paul and colleagues, together with other studies say that the
implication of animal DCP as a source of BSE, if it existed, should
have been marginal.
In contrast, a risk analysis by the European
Food Safety Agency [2] considers the potential role of animal DCP in
cattle infection as to be of the same order of magnitude as the
residual risk from cross-contamination with MBM.
Animal fat in milk replacers
This
study cannot exclude a minor effect of animal fat in milk replacers
because of the solubility of prions and the possible contamination with
protein impurities by contact with other infectious materials at the
slaughterhouse. Animal fat is incorporated in cattle feed in milk
replacer and in proprietary concentrates.
The authors point to
the fact that in current context of the decreasing epidemic, economic
pressure is increasing to release the ban of MBM in feed for
monogastric species.
[1] Paul, Mathilde; Abrial, David;
Jarrige, Nathalie; Rican, Stéphane;Garrido, Myriam; Calavas, Didier;
Ducrot Christian:Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy and Spatial Analysis
of the Feed Industry. Emerging Infectious Diseases, Volume 13, Number
6–June 2007
http://www.cdc.gov/eid/content/13/6/867.htm
[2]
Opinion of the Scientific Panel BIOHAZ on the "Quantitative assessment
of the residual BSE risk posed by di-calcium phosphate (DCP) and
tri-calcium phosphate (TCP) from bovine bones used as an animal feed
additive or as fertiliser". 16. March 2006
www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/biohaz/biohaz_opinions/1440.html
05.06.2007: Strategies to reduce person-to-person transmission during epidemics[1]
Seto
and colleagues 2007 studied the spinach Escherichia coli O157:H7 (E.
coli O157) outbreak in the United States in 2006 with 173 cases and one
death.
During the spread of the disease the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention and the US Food and Drug Administration advised
consumers not to eat spinach as the primary strategy for protecting
against foodborne transmission of E. coli O157. No warnings, however,
were issued regarding the prevention of person-to-person (secondary)
transmission.
The authors assume that a combination of possible
intervention strategies to interrupt secondary transmission would have
a range of possible levels of effectiveness in epidemics like this.
These strategies would include strongly recommending handwashing,
avoiding contact with persons with diarrhea, meticulously preparing
food, and avoiding work or school when ill with any gastrointestinal
sign or symptom.
The researchers found in this study that an
intervention such as a campaign to encourage handwashing and isolation
of persons with diarrhea can substantially reduce secondary
transmission. Even if a campaign were initiated relatively late in the
outbreak, the number of cases would be reduced. Such advice was not a
focus of the public health messages disseminated for the 2006 E. coli
O157 outbreak. The interruption of secondary transmission might have
had a useful role as an additional tool in managing this outbreak.
Public Health Implications
Public
health strategies for preventing secondary transmission could include
public media campaigns reminding the population of the importance of
handwashing, avoiding contact with feces, minimizing nonessential
contact with persons with diarrhea, meticulous care when preparing and
consuming food, and staying at home from work or school when having any
diarrhea during the outbreak period. Messages for all of these
strategies can be delivered inexpensively to large or targeted
populations through a variety of media (television, radio, print,
Internet).
Conclusion
The
authors conclude that health officials should consider rapidly
delivering widespread public health messages with specific advice on
how to interrupt secondary transmission of E. coli O157. Such an
intervention, even if only modestly successful, could meaningfully
reduce the number of cases.
[1] Seto EYW, Soller JA, Colford
JM Jr. Strategies to reduce person-to-person transmission during
widespread Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreak. Emerg Infect Dis [serial
on the Internet]. 2007 Jun.
http://www.cdc.gov/eid/content/13/6/860.htm
05.06.2007:
Report on Epidemiological analysis of the 2006 bluetongue virus
serotype 8 epidemic in north-western Europe updated in June 2007. [1]
Bluetongue
(BT) is an arthropod-borne viral disease caused by the BTV-serotype 8
(BTV-8) It affects domestic and wild ruminants, particularly certain
breeds of sheep. It is a severe clinical disease, including mortality
which rapidly spread in north-western Europe in 2006 . It affected
cattle and sheep holdings in Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg, and
The Netherlands.
The main findings reported by the EFSA bluetongue working group
Statistical modelling showed that the initial infection occurred in the area close to Maastricht.
The
source of the introduction of BTV-8 could not be identified and the
exact origin and route of the introduction of BTV-8 thus far remains
unknown. However, the absence of legal import of ruminants from outside
the EU into the Area of First Infection and the absence of BTV-8 from
southern Europe suggest that the introduction of the BTV-8 infection
into north-western Europe is likely to have occurred via a other than
through import of infected ruminants.
Specifically, the potential
for Culicoides to be imported along with or independently of the import
of animals, plants or other ‘materials’ merits further study.
Monitoring
Sheep flocks should be monitored by a system based on clinical signs, as PCR in affected sheep is often negative.
Cattle monitoring system based on serological surveillance is being recommended.
Culicoides as a vector of BTV
The BTV-8 virus was found to be present in vectors (Culicoides species)
which are endemic to north-western Europe. C. imicola, which is thought
to be responsible for at least 90% of BTV transmission in the
Mediterranean Basin, was not found in the affected region. Indigenous
Culicoides found to be PCR-positive were C. dewulfi (a species breeding
exclusively in the dung of cattle and horses) and C. obsoletus / C.
scoticus.
In all likelihood this persistent activity of adult
Culicoides owes much to the mild temperatures that have continued to
prevail across northern Europe during the winter of 2006/2007.
Local
spread was modelled and found to occur at a rate of about 2 km per day
or approximately 15 km per week and equals the flight distances covered
by Culicoides.
Wind may affect spread over long distances. In
particular, the density of the observed wind events contributed, at
least in part, to explaining the spread of BTV
Conclusion
The
report concludes that changes in climatic conditions coupled with
increased worldwide traffic might increase the risk in the appearance
and the establishment of diseases in parts of Europe that were thus far
exotic to those regions.
[1] European Food Safety Authority:
Report on Epidemiological analysis of the 2006 bluetongue virus
serotype 8 epidemic in north-western Europe.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/in_focus/bluetongue/bluetongue_report_s8.html
05.06.2007: Greater potential of CWD-infected deer than elk to transmit the disease to other species [1]
Brent
L. Race and colleagues 2007 studied the potential for cross-species
transmission of chronic wasting disease (CWD) of deer and elk.
According to he researchers CWD prevalence in wild elk is much lower
than its prevalence in wild deer. The researchers found that the
quantification of prion protein from tonsil and retropharyngeal lymph
nodes showed much higher levels of PrPres in deer than in elk,
suggesting that CWD-infected deer may be more likely than elk to
transmit the disease to other cervids and have a greater potential to
transmit CWD to noncervids.
The high presence of PrPres in deer
lymphoid tissues suggest that infectivity might also be present in
other peripheral tissues such as intestine, kidney, or salivary glands,
which could possibly lead to excretion or secretion of infectivity in
faeces, urine, or saliva. in confined settings, where animal-to-animal
contact increases.
CWD transmission to humans
Earlier
studies have not shown any evidence for transmission of CWD to humans.
CWD has been transmitted to cattle by intracerebral but not by oral
inoculation, and no reports have found that co-pasturing of
CWD-infected deer or elk with cattle has resulted in transmission.
Raymond and colleagues 2000 [2] found in vitro assays designed to test
the susceptibility of humans or cattle to CWD suggested a very low
probability of transmission to humans. Raymond suggests that there
might be a barrier at the molecular level that should limit the
susceptibility of non-cervid species to CWD.
Sheep might cross CWD species barrier
Race
and colleagues suggest that among livestock, sheep might be a possible
target for CWD infection in appropriate situations such as
co-pasturing. Also, a CWD agent from putatively infected sheep could
have a host range not usually associated with CWD and might cross
species barriers more readily than CWD from cervids. Thus, if CWD
continues to expand in deer and elk populations, the possibility of
transmission to noncervid species will require continued surveillance.
[1]
Race, Brent L.; Meade-White, Kimberly D.; Ward, Anne; Jewell, Jean;
Miller, Michael W. Williams, Elizabeth S.; Chesebro, Bruce; Race,
Richard E. :Levels of Abnormal Prion Protein in Deer and Elk with
Chronic Wasting Disease. Emerging Infectious Diseases. Volume 13,
Number 6-June 2007
http://www.cdc.gov/eid/content/13/6/824.htm
[2]
Raymond GJ, Bossers A, Raymond LD, O'Rourke KI, McHolland LE, Bryant PK
3rd, et al.: Evidence of a molecular barrier limiting susceptibility of
humans, cattle and sheep to chronic wasting disease. EMBO J. 2000 Sep
1;19(17):4425-30.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids
=10970836&dopt=Abstract
04.06.2007: Prickly pear cactus pads may control diabetes in Mexico[1]
Nopales
are made from the young stem segments of prickly pear cactus, peeled to
remove the spines. Opuntia ficus indica and other cactuses are
cultivated in Mexico. Nopales are very rich in insoluble and especially
soluble dietary fibre. They are also rich in vitamines and minerals.
Nopales
reduces the glycemic effect of a mixed meal according to Bacardi-Gascon
and colleagues 2007 who studied the effect of the cactus pear nopales
on blood sugar levels when eaten with regular Mexican fodder like
burritos and quesadillas. Bacardi-Gascon and colleagues concluded that
Mexican patients could use nopales as a culturally based choice for the
management of diabetes. [2]
Caterpillars of the Cactoblastis
cactorum (Berg), known as the Prickly Pear Moth feed on the pads
(cladodes) of cactus and may endanger yelds. [3]
[1] Wikipedia, the free enzyclopedia: Nopal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nopal
[2]
Bacardi-Gascon, Montserrat; Duenas-Mena, Dulce; and Jimenez-Cruz,
Arturo:Lowering Effect on Postprandial Glycemic Response of Nopales
Added to Mexican Breakfasts
Diabetes Care 2007, Volume 30: 1264-1265.
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/extract/30/5/1264
[3] USDA National Agricultural Library: Invasive Species: Cactus Moth http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/animals/cactusmoth.shtml
04.06.2007: Fifth Annual CJD Foundation Family Conference [1]
The
fifth annual CJD Foundation Family Conference, July 6-8 in Washington,
D.C. and also join our advocacy visits to the Hill on July 9. Check
http://www.cjdfoundation.org/headlines.php?ptime=1166193255 website for
the Program, and other information about this event.
Some of the problems the foundation looks after are:
Reduction of BSE tests on US cows [2]
Over
the last few years, a type of Acquired CJD called variant (vCJD) has
been identified in young people. vCJD has been linked to ingestion of
beef tainted with BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy), most cases
have occurred in the United Kingdom. Testing cows being slaughtered
helped to reduce the risk of vCJD.
However, according to
Florence's Newsletter, the USDA tests so few cows it would be
impossible for anyone to know how prevalent U.S. BSE really is. Cattle
testing was increased from 40,000 per year to 375,000 for an 18 month
period following the discovery - there are 35 million cattle
slaughtered for the U.S. food supply each year. [2]
The Secretary
of Agriculture Mike Johanns was asked last July by a commission leaded
by the CDJ Disease Foundation that the increased number of BSE testing
should not be cut back but instead that it be increased. One week after
this petition USDA cut back to the previous 40,000. [2]
In a letter
to Florence at Creutzfeld-Jacobs Disease Foundation dated October 3,
2006 Mr. Johanns stated.... "With regard to USDA's activities, it is
important to understand ...USDA's BSE surveillance is being conducted
not as a food safety measure but rather as a monitoring effort designed
to evaluate the effectiveness of the United States' BSE safeguarding
measures with respect to animal health".
According to Florence it is
difficult to understand how human risk from infected meat takes a back
seat to what appears to be a policy benefiting specific special
interest groups. [2]
A statement released yesterday reported that
Japan and South Korea will soon be opening their borders to our cattle
again based on the U.S. upgraded rating from the OIE (World
Organization for Animal Health) from "possible risk" to "controlled
risk". The USDA's Chief Veterinary Office Dr. Ron DeHaven serves as the
U.S. official delegate to the OIE. Through the OIE decision the USDA is
now able to avoid accountability at all costs, even those directly
related to human lives. [2]
[1]Annual Family Conference Schedule Tentative Schedule July 6 --9, 2007
http://www.cjdfoundation.org/headlines.php?ptime=1166193255
[2] May Newsletter by wanda May 30, 2007 02:03 PM News; May 23, 2007
http://www.cjdfoundation.org/headlines.php?ptime=1167759120
04.06.2007: New-Zealand GM cow produces skim milk [1]
In
an article by Cath O'Driscoll in Chemistry and Industry genetic
modification of cows to produce skim milk is reported. The authors
claim that special genes could be used to breed herds of animals
producing only skimmed milk.
The authors say that a commercial
herd will be available by 2011. The research is being done by the
biotech firm ViaLactia at the dairy co-operative Fonterra which already
makes milk from one of the GM cows which was named Merge. The new GM
cow will fit very well into the good selling market of low fat products.
According
to the authors this could reduce the surplus of cream and there would
be no need for disposal. However, the cream is used to make butter and
other products such as ice cream, confectioneries,and bakeries. There
is no need for a genetic modification of cows to produce skimmed milk.
The dairy industry does this with powerful centrifuges.
Another exciting development of their cows they are working on is to produce a GM cow which
gives
butter that is spreadable straight from the fridge. Experiments to
soften butter using special feed are not so successful as the change to
GM cows.
[1] O'Driscoll, Cath: Skimmed milk straight from the cow. Chemistry and Industry 28 May 2007 - Issue No 10 - Page 11
http://www.chemind.org/CI/viewissue.jsp?dateOfIssue=2007-05-28¤tIssueType=News&pt=CI
03.06.2007: The White Paper on nutrition, overweight and obesity [1]
The
white paper on A Strategy for Europe on Nutrition, Overweight and
Obesity related health issues was adopted by the European Commission on
30.05.2007. It is based on the EU Platform for Action on Diet, Physical
Activity and Health, initiated in 2005, and green paper on promoting
healthy diets and physical activity 2005. The paper contains principles
for action and partnership approach. It focuses better-informed
consumer, allowing them to make informed, evidence-based decisions
about what foods to buy to tackle obesity. [1]
The Commission's preference, at this stage, is to keep the existing voluntary
approach at EU level due to the fact that it can potentially act quickly and effectively to tackle
rising overweight and obesity rates. [1]
Voluntary
efforts to ensure adverts aimed at children should be combined with
rules at the level of individual member states, such as those recently
implemented by the Office of Communication in the UK. Industry has
already taken important steps but these have not always been uniform
across products and Member States. Some Member States are encouraging
reformulation of foods, for example in terms of their levels of fat,
saturated and trans fats, salt and sugar. [1]
All these
reformulations (and there are only few of them) took place under heavy
pressure of consumer associations or retailers fearing bad publicity.
The
CIAA has fought against being seen as a scapegoat for obesity and
welcomes the White Paper, enforcing physical exercise to reduce
obesity, and refers to its own Brochure [2] [3]
Eurocommerce,
speaking for its members, welcomes the White Paper stressing the
importance of education programme in schools, since nutrition and
healthy lifestyle education should start at an early age.
The
European Consumers Organisation BEUC, however, says the White Paper is
disappointing because it relies on revision of nutritional labelling.
Advertising of food for children is mentioned vaguely about
partnerships and voluntary measures, with a review in 2010.
BEUC
says what consumers urgently need is simple and understandable on-pack
labelling to help them make the most appropriate nutritional choices,
since they cannot rely on advertising. Promotion of foods high in fat,
sugar and salt for children exerts pressure on parents, but the
solution, relies on the source of pressure on advertising. [5]
[1] White Paper on a Strategy for Europe on Nutrition, Overweight and Obesity related health issues
http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/life_style/nutrition/keydocs_nutrition_en.htm
[2] CIAA statement on Commission's White Paper on Nutrition, Overweight and Obesity. CIAA News 31.05.2007.
http://www.ciaa.be/pages_en/press_area/news_list.asp
[3] CIAA Brochure: Promoting balanced diets and healthy lifestyles.
http://www.ciaa.eu/pages_en/documents/brochure_detailed.asp?brochure_id=47
[4]Eurocommerce Commerce welcomes the White Paper establishing an EU strategy to fight against obesity. Brussels, 30 May
http://www.eurocommerce.be/content.aspx?pageId=40895
[5]beuc: The White Paper is like many slimming regimes - built on false hopes and unrealistic expectations
http://docshare.beuc.org/Common/GetFile.asp?ID=23227&mfd=off&LogonName=Guesten
03.06.2007: Supplements with vitamin B may be harmful [1]
It is known that folate deficiency induces DNA breaks and may alter cellular capacity for mutation and epigenetic methylation.
However,
Schernhammer and colleagues 2007 found that supplements did not reduce
the risk of cancer. B vitamins from multivitamin pills increased risk
of developing pancreatic cancer by 139 per cent.
The mechanism of the different effect from vitamin from supplements and the effect of vitamins absorbed from food is unknown.
The
authors suggest that the growth of a dormant tumor may be stimulated by
folate and other similar vitamins, especially in case if a person with
chronic shortage of these nutrients in his diet suddenly starts taking
multivitamins in an effort to become healthy. Similar results have been
found studying oestrogen-rich soy. Women eating soy all life long
reduced the risk of breast cancer, but those who suddenly started to
eat soy did increase the risk.
In this study nonusers of
multivitamins were found to have a modest inverse trend between folate,
PLP, and B12 and pancreatic cancer risk. This has not been observed
among people using multivitamin supplement and among those who obtain
these factors exclusively through dietary sources, there may be an
inverse relation between vitamin B and the risk.
The authors
advice is to maintain a normal weight and eat their fruit and
vegetables to avoid pancreatic cancer. Liver, wholegrain cereals, dairy
products and green vegetables are good sources of B vitamins.
[1]
Schernhammer, Eva; Wolpin, Brian;Rifai, Nader; Cochrane, Barbara;
Manson, Jo An; Ma, Jing; Giovannucci, Ed; Thomson, Cynthia; Stampfer,
Meir and Fuchs, Charles: Plasma folate, vitamins B6, B12, and
homocysteine and pancreatic cancer risk in four large cohorts Cancer
Research 1 June 2007, Volume 67, Issue 11 5553-5560.
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/67/11/5553
03.06.2007 Antimicrobial silver as antimicrobial agent in packaging materials
To
increase shelf life of food products a line of styrene copolymers using
silver-based antimicrobial ingredients from Agion were developed by
BASF providing continuous protection from microbes by releasing silver
ions to the surface of the product at a slow and steady rate
Silver
is already being incorporated in plastics, such as used in
refrigerators, water filtration, cutting boards, cellphones, keyboard
and clinical devices turning the surfaces self sanitising. [1]
European cheese coating with silver ions
According
Ag POLYMER an antimicrobial cheese polymer coating with silver-ion
zeolite ist intended to coat cheese and protect it from microbes in the
European dairy industry. [2]
Agion's silver antimicrobial
ingredient has been approved for food and water contact by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the European Food Safety
Agency.It is a notified existing substance under the EU's directive
European Biocidal Products Directive (BPD) and listed for use as an
indirect food contact substance with the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). [3]
[1] Agion Antimicrobial: BASF forms exclusive partnership with Agion Technologies. Press release May 25, 2007.
http://www.agion-tech.com/NewsAndEvents.aspx?id=776
[2] Agion Technologies and AgPOLYMER Introduce Antimicrobial Cheese Coating Polymers Press release April 24, 2007
http://www.agion-tech.com/NewsAndEvents.aspx?id=742
[3] Agion: Regulatory guidance
http://www.agion-tech.com/CustomerPrograms.aspx?id=120
02.06.2007: FTC Children's Exposure to TV Advertising Report [1]
The
research looks at television ad exposure for children in the year 2004
and compares it to similar research from 1977. The report also finds
that children are not exposed to more food ads on television than they
were in the past, although their ad exposure is more concentrated on
children’s programming. This means that it turns out to be more
refined, concentrating on the susceptible group of children aged 2-11
years.
FTC says that food ads account for 22 percent, and hildren get approximately half of their food advertising and about one-third of their total television advertising exposure from programs in which children are at least 50 percent of the audience.
According to the FTC Report the winner of most frequent food ads was "Restaurants and Fast Food" (Last of the133 pages). [2]
The
CSPI comments this report and says that the 2004 findings are no cause
for much celebration. As parents know, television is just a one slice
of an ever-expanding pie of food marketing aimed at kids. CSPI sees the
future that food advertisers are engaging in a massive, sophisticated
multimedia campaign to get kids to eat junk food. It's a campaign that
uses in-school marketing, games on websites, licensed
"spokescharacters" on food packages, and other tactics. It's a campaign
that helps fuel the skyrocketing rates of childhood obesity and
diabetes. There's virtually no encouragement at all to eat healthy
foods like fruits and vegetables. And that kind of corporate
irresponsibility is why parents are increasingly looking to Congress
and even the courts to help protect kids' health. [3]
The
activity of the UK government banning completely junk food from
children TV is a good step forward to avoid children obesity.[4]
To promote healthy foods the CSPI proudly presents:
Ten foods you should NEVER eat
http://www.cspinet.org/nah/10foods_bad.html
Ten superfoods for better health
http://www.cspinet.org/nah/10foods_good.html
[1] Federal Trade Commission. Protecting America's Consumer: Children not seeing more food ads on Television. Release 01.06.2007
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/06/childrenadsstudy.shtm
[2] Federal Trade Commission:The Report June 1, 2007
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2007/06/cabecolor.pdf
[3] CSPI Food Marketers Rely less on TV in Favour of Other Marketing, Says CSPI about FTC Report. Friday, June 1, 2007
http://www.cspinet.org/new/200706012.html
[4] 26.02.2007: OFCOM UK advertising regulations far better than US self regulation.
http://www.ourfood-news.com/Archives_February_2007.html
01.06.2007
Eating regularly in some fast-food chain outlets is unsafe in many
parts of the world according to a study presented at the 15th European
Congress on Obesity Budapest. [1] [2]
Food
quality and portion sizes need to be improved dramatically, according
to the Copenhagen University research group, led by Prof Steen Stender,
who found major variations in the quality of products offered by the
same chains across 35 countries.
Fast foods examined in the global
survey were found to have not just a high fat content, but also up to
17 times the level of trans-fatty acids legally permitted in Denmark,
which introduced a ban in 2004. Business directors deliberately
breaching the Danish restriction could face stiff fines and up to two
years in jail.
Countries with unsafe foods
Eastern
Europe fared particularly badly in the survey with Hungary, Bulgaria,
Poland and the Czech Republic topping the table with levels of
unhealthy trans-fats accounting for 29-34% of the fat content.
Countries meeting the Danish standard
Fast
food in India, Russia, Spain and in Scotland met the Danish standard
requiring less than 2% of the total fat content in a product to be
trans-fats.
Wide discrepancies with McDonald's food
Checks
on McDonald's also revealed wide discrepancies, with the highest
percentage of trans-fats found in Oman at 20%. In the United Kingdom,
samples in London, Glasgow and Aberdeen reached 15-16%, with levels of
14-15% in Hong Kong, Poland and South Africa, compared to 14-16% found
in US outlets.
After analysing 74 samples of French fries and fried
chicken (nuggets/hot wings) bought in McDonalds and KFC outlets in 35
countries in 2005 and 2006, they concluded that the idea that a typical
fast-food meal was the same worldwide was "a myth".
According to
Prof Arne Astrup the companies selling foods with high levels of
trans-fat disregard customers' health. They will only really respond
when there are regulations as tough as they are in Denmark.
Recommendations to Fast Food chains
The
authors suggest fast food chains should provide reliable nutritional
information, which requires better standardisation of the foods used
and recommend suppliers take action to reduce portions to "normal"
sizes and eliminate industrially produced trans fat, as well as
offering burgers made of lean meat, whole grain bread/buns, fat-reduced
mayonnaise, add more vegetable, lower-fat fried potatoes and
reduced-sugar soft drinks.
[1] 15th European Congress on Obesity
Budapest, Hungary April 22-25 2007: Fast Food Health Lottery- Frequent
Consumption "Unsafe" warns Obesity Experts.
http://www.iotf.org/documents/TuesdayTransfatpressreleaseembargo24th.pdf
[2]EASO Budapest
http://www.eco2007.org/
01.06.2007: TV Junk Food advertising ban
The
junk food advertising ban in UK should be introduced all over Europe to
tackle the obesity problem. Two recent studies confirmed TV adds
influencing children nutritional habits.
The Campden and Chorelywood report on children's food choice [1]
Campden
and Chorelywood Food Research Association (CCFRA) has published a
review that aims to bring together all the research on triggers for
children's food choices - be it biological or physiological, or related
to taste, hunger, appearance, family habits, schools, advertising, cost
and availability. This report supports UK government efforts to reduce
children TV advertising of high fat, sugar and salt foods.
The Liverpool University 2007 obesity study [2]
In
a study conducted by Dr Jason Halford and colleagues from the
University of Liverpool, a group of 60 children of varying weights,
aged between nine and eleven years was shown a series of both food
television adverts and toy adverts, followed by a cartoon. Food intake
following the food adverts was significantly higher compared with the
toy adverts in all weight groups, with the obese children increasing
their consumption by 134%; overweight children by 101% and normal
weight children by 84%.
The researchers concluded that food TV
advertising has a profound effect on all children's eating habits,
doubling their consumption rate. The TV ban is still not full effective
because many children still watch in the evening when the ban does not
apply. It will therefore be necessary to extend the ban for later
hours. This study presented at the 15th European Congress on Obesity
22-25 May 2007 in Budapest helps to back up the UK efforts to ban TV
junk food advertising
[1]CCFRA Review No. 53 (2007): Issues in children's food choices: methods for sensory and consumer research.
http://www.campden.co.uk/scripts/fcp.pl?words=children+advertising&wt=be&bl
=or&d=/publ/pubfiles/r53.htm
[2]University of Liverpool: TV food adverts increase obese children's appetite by 134%. Press release 24.05.2007.
http://www.liv.ac.uk/newsroom/press_releases/2007/04/obesity_ads.htm